As early as 15 September 2001 world leaders started expressing doubt.

Hosni Mubarak’s misgivings about official 9/11 account:

S0 During a CNN interview on 15 September 2001, Mubarak discussed the attack on the Pentagon, saying, “The Pentagon is not very high, a pilot could come straight to the Pentagon like this to hit, he should have flown a lot in this area to know the obstacles which could meet him when he is flying very low with a big commercial plane to hit the Pentagon in a special place.” He added, “Somebody has studied this very well, someone has flown in this area very much.” When asked, “Are you suggesting it was an inside operation, I may ask, who do you think is behind this?” he replied, “Frankly speaking, I don’t want to jump to conclusions... let us wait and see what is the result of the investigations, because something like this done in the United States is not an easy thing ... I am speaking as a former pilot, I know that very well, I flew very heavy planes, I flew fighters, I know that very well, this is not an easy thing, so I think we should not jump to conclusions from now."

Interviewed on the BBC on 19 September 2001, when asked about the expected repercussions of an assault on Afghanistan and the killing of Osama bin Laden, Mubarak said he didn’t believe bin Laden alone was responsible for the attacks on the US. "American experts also believe the operation is beyond bin Laden.

In a later article, he repeated his concerns, saying, “I find it hard to believe that people who were learning to fly in Florida could, within a year and a half, fly large commercial airlines and hit with accuracy the towers of the World Trade Center which would appear, to the pilot from the air, the size of a pencil. Only a professional pilot could carry out this mission, not someone who learned to fly for 18 months in Florida.”

Mubarak also later claimed that Egyptian intelligence had warned US officials 12 days before 9/11 that al-Qaeda was in the advance stages of conducting a significant operation against a US target. - Source

Also read: Pentagon 9/11 Whistleblower on Redacted - US Army member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry

Below is a short clip from Jesse Ventura's TV series Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura that specifically questioned the 9/11 Pentagon event, titled "Pentagon," first aired on December 17, 2010. (Season 2, Episode 8) 3 minute clip

Note that some statements have been disputed or clarified later, and many are associated with broader “conspiracy theories”.

• Hamid Gul (former Director-General of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency, Pakistan) - September 26, 2001: In an interview shortly after the attacks, Gul claimed they were an “inside job” orchestrated by Israel/Mossad with U.S. complicity, rather than al-Qaeda. source
• Muammar Gaddafi (former President of Libya) In a significant 2002 interview with CNN, Muammar Gaddafi addressed the September 11 attacks, positioning himself as an opponent of Al-Qaeda and terrorism. source
• Bob Graham (U.S. Senator from Florida and co-chair of the Congressional Joint Inquiry into 9/11, United States) - May 12, 2003: Accused the Bush administration of a “coverup” regarding intelligence failures and Saudi involvement before and after the attacks, implying incomplete disclosure in the official narrative. Source
• Andreas von Bülow (former Minister of Research and Technology, Germany) - 2003 (book publication): In his book The CIA and September 11, argued that the attacks were staged by U.S. elements to justify wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. source
• Michael Meacher (former Environment Minister under Tony Blair, United Kingdom) - September 6, 2003: In a Guardian op-ed, suggested the U.S. government may have knowingly failed to prevent the attacks, raising questions about foreknowledge and motives tied to Iraq. Source

Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez said that it’s plausible that the US Government was involved in the September 11 attacks.

S0 Sept. 12, 2006: Chavez did not specifically accuse the U.S. government of having a hand in the Sept. 11 attacks, but rather suggested that theories of U.S. involvement bear examination.

The Venezuelan leader, an outspoken critic of U.S. President George W. Bush, was reacting to a television report investigating a theory the Twin Towers were brought down with explosives after hijacked airplanes crashed into them in 2001.

“The hypothesis is not absurd ... that those towers could have been dynamited,” Chavez said in a speech to supporters. “A building never collapses like that, unless it’s with an implosion.”

“The hypothesis that is gaining strength ... is that it was the same U.S. imperial power that planned and carried out this terrible terrorist attack or act against its own people and against citizens of all over the world,” Chavez said. “Why? To justify the aggressions that immediately were unleashed on Afghanistan, on Iraq.”

Chavez has said the U.S. launched those wars to ensure its political and economic power. Source

• Fidel Castro (former President and leader of Cuba) - September 12, 2007: Accused the U.S. of spreading disinformation and fooling the world about 9/11, implying the official story was fabricated. source
• Francesco Cossiga (former President of Italy) - November 30, 2007: In a Corriere della Sera interview, claimed the attacks were a joint CIA-Mossad operation, known among Italian center-left circles (though later reports suggested he may have been sarcastic or not serious). source
• Muammar Gaddafi (former President of Libya) In a significant 2009 interview, with CNN’s Larry King, Muammar Gaddafi addressed the September 11 attacks, The 911 Terrorist Were Not From Afghanistan Or Iraq! source
• Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (President of Iran) - March 2008 initial doubts; (expanded in 2010 UN speech): Described 9/11 as a “suspect event” and “big lie,” later stating in September 2010 that segments of the U.S. government orchestrated it to save the economy and support Israel. source 3 minute clip
• Mahathir Mohamad (former Prime Minister of Malaysia) - January 2010: Claimed there was “strong evidence” the attacks were staged or faked by the U.S. to justify wars against Muslims. source

Let’s do some quick thought experiments, and look at who the core team behind 9/11 could be and what roles they played. (6 minute clip)Who in the media were “in the know” and how did they cover-up, and deflect from the truth of what really happened at all three sites? (5 minute clip)Lastly, for people studying 9/11 for decades, why do they struggle when the full extent of the deception is pointed out to them? (4 minute clip)

The clips above are excerpts from the book by Dr Morgan Reynolds and John Herold “ChatGPT and 9/11: A Thought Experiment with Artificial Intelligence Volume 1.”

S0 See Chapter 43 about limited hangouts as well as Chapter 44 about the 9/11 truth movement. Here’s a link to the Kindle edition & a link to standard color printed edition.

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

Can artificial intelligence help us understand what really happened on 9/11?

Or is it just a propaganda tool? The answer to both questions is yes.

Without clever questioning, ChatGPT blindly follows the official government conspiracy theory, upholding the myth that nineteen young Arabs hijacked airliners and crashed them into the Twin Towers, leading to gravity-driven collapses. Hogwash!

The mode of destruction that destroyed all of the buildings in the WTC complex was proven over fourteen years ago by Human Intelligence. Read more here.

In this interview, Andrew Johnson discusses the new book “ChatGPT and 9/11 - Operation Headfake: A Thought Experiment with Artificial Intelligence” co-authored by Dr Morgan Reynolds and John Herold, MA.

What does AI, when presented with a “fictional” scenario (which matches real events) reveal about the events of 9/11, the planning and the cover up?

See Chapter 43 about limited hangouts as well as Chapter 44 about the 9/11 truth movement.

Here’s a link to the Kindle edition & a link to standard color printed edition.

S0

S0 As discussed in the interview, it does have some shortcomings, but 📄 here is Elias Davidsson’s research.

If you haven’t read any of Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research work, see his Substack and his interview with Jerm Warfare.

My Interview with 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - Link

Also read: Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001 - An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza - Link

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

The thing is, this podcast has a huge following and is really involved with the camp 2 alternative media talking heads in the 9/11 ‘truth” sphere, and has been platforming a lot of dissenters of the official government narrative, who all can be proven to be disseminating half truths, when it comes to the events on September 11, 2001.

As 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza wrote: I once saw a great sign posted on a church lawn that read, “A half-truth is still a whole lie.”

For those of you that are not up to speed with the DEW in Venezuela, here is a summary;

Now, the development of DEW by the US MIC as far back as the early 1960’s have been well documented in my various articles and especially with the 1989 US MIC invasion of Panama, as you will see in this 1992 investigative documentary, The Panama Deception, which earned an Academy Award.

For more of a background, I suggest you read, Tesla, the Military Industrial Complex Weapon Technology & 9/11 - $1

The article has additional links to all my DEW related articles, which also covers the timeline of how Tesla made the technology available to multiple countries, as he did not want any country to have the upper hand.

Just before I jump eyeballs deep into breaking down this upsetting coverage I saw last night, here is a little nugget from 12 years ago, brought to you by Raytheon.

The cover photo is used for representational purposes only.

Ok - Let’s get stuck into this report on directed energy weapons possibly being used in Venezuela by the Redacted podcast, brought to you by Nataliand Clayton Morris, that starts at the 1 hour 11 minute mark.

S0 Before we get into it, I need to take you back to September 2025 and what role Redacted has played in being part of the greater gaslighting of good intentioned truth seekers, seeking truth for what happened on 9/11.

This coming Friday, my article - Revisiting 2024 - A most successful 9/11 year - Repetition can make falsehoods seem true, will compliment what I’m laying out now…

Redacted has been very helpful with countering the US Government official narrative on what happened on 9/11, as they have platformed many dissenters over the years, as they have a massive line-up of 9/11 related content, when you do a search on their YouTube channel. It’s a great camp 2 of truth awareness resource, to keep you from camp 3.

S0 As discussed with 9/11 Planes Research, we went through all the disinformation talking points being peddled pertaining CGI planes, military planes, video fakery and especially the IMPOSSIBILITY of radio controlled planes (research that’s been out since 2007) and even their star pilot Captain Dan has ADMITTED on a live X, Q&A that I’m more knowledgeable than he is, when it comes to flight dynamics, physics and what other researchers have covered, yet Captain Dan is still NOT changing his story, much like other 9/11 researchers, when presented with more concrete evidence that completely overshadows what he wants you to believe… I suggest you listen to the discussion. Link

S0 I was surprised to see mention in the build up to September 2025, that a plea was put out for more MONEY, to have the camp 2 information be peddled by Redacted…

S0

S0 Now, I must state - I’m not sure if the 2-person AV staff was Redacted staff and $10k is A LOT of money…

If haven’t read, DONATE TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation - Where is the money going? - I suggest you head over and work through it, before reading further…

I have covered all the shenanigans pertaining to the coverage of the 24th anniversary of September 11, 2001 and the following articles are what you should go have a look at.

S02025 Turned the Tide for REAL 9/11 Truth

S0Archive of my articles Ok, I digress - Back to Redacted discussing Directed Energy Weapons.

Please note: It’s important you listen to this monologue and pay attention to how he expands on the “mocking bird media”, as he had Kevin Shipp, a veteran of the CIA who’s been exposing the shadow government that essentially control Washington DC, on his show two weeks ago, and how Clayton tries to position himself as an arbiter of truth, when he himself is unwittingly, or fully aware that he too is part of the “mocking bird ALT Media” and I’ll come to that, as I dissect this 25 minute clip from his show he did yesterday….

The first three minutes are already laughable, we he wants to state he’s being suppressed by the YouTube algorithm, when some of his 9/11 related content gets over 1 million views and I recently lost my 5th YouTube channel in less than three years, so Clayton buddy your camp 2 truth, is keeping your lights on…

I just LOVE this statement Clayton makes: “I often say this I’ll say this again. Like I uh there’s there’s people who are willfully ignorant on purpose, right? They they do not want to see something. They don’t want to see child trafficking. They don’t want to see what’s happening in Ukraine. They don’t want to see what their CIA is doing to them.

They don’t want to study what’s happening with chemtrails. They want to ignore all of it, right? They just want to be willfully ignorant and go about their lives. And they they block off that part of their brain. It’s a psychological effect. Really people do that on purpose and then there are people who are just ignorant be not because and I don’t you know I’m not saying like you’re a fool in that way but they’re busy they’ve got three kids they have a job they’ve got a family to run they get like a few minutes in the day maybe in their car to listen to the radio the news on the you know on their drive they put on NPR or something like that you know and they don’t know any better and they that’s where they get their news from like NPR basically a USID cutout of the CIA right I and they’re they’re they’re they’re getting that pared news.

So, they don’t go a layer deeper to see if it’s actually true and who’s funding it and where that money is coming from and actually funding this stuff. So, and I feel badly for those people. I have I have empathy for those people, I always say, because they’ve got a busy life and and so forth.

So, I want to thank the tens of thousands of you watching right now on Rumble and on YouTube and X. You’ve taken time out of your day to hopefully educate yourselves and we do our level best here to provide you with the facts. We are not Democrats. We’re not Republicans. The UNI Party is a corrupt blob and we just want to bring you the facts and you make your own decisions about how you vote or live your life.”

Hey Clayton! Let’s remind you of a little something my camp 2 friend…

A whole industry has been created - A whole “truth” movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.

Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.

Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.

Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..

• Dr Reynolds’ case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports.
• Dr Wood’s case was for the destruction at the WTC complex.

So, Clayton buddy - It’s time you search deeper too, stop gaslighting your audience.

A good point was made: “So have you seen anyone do you know anyone who’s passed away supposed to be non-lethal? Non-lethal. Do you know anyone who’s passed away from it? Yes. Yes. Yes. Good. Phil, you’re they’re starting to see these in some of the protests around the country in the US uh sitting in the back of pickup trucks. I’ve seen several images recently of of these like sonic weapons in back of pickup trucks at protest sites. Yeah. Yeah. For crowd dispersement firing these microwaves. But they’re non-lethal. But oh, you’ve also seen people die from them. Yes. Yes. Yes. So in the immediate No, it’s non-lethal. however many months.

Yeah. I mean, who knows? In the case in the case of a protest though, I mean, yeah, it could be for crowd dispersal or or incitement because I mean, if this if it makes you crazy like if they’re just doing this low sort of like, you know, annoying buzz into a crowd, like, can it can it ramp things up? You know, it it’s it’s dangerous stuff all around. Yeah. Oh, exactly.”

Clayton goes on to discuss the active denial system, plays a clip from Fox news where they were discussing this new technology and a clip from a senate hearing on the non-lethal weaponry, but then he pivots away from the US MIC’s bag of black-ops tech.

Clayton makes the statement: “Directed energy isn’t like a magic wand. It’s an arms category right now and major powers have been working on it for years.

China, for example, has been reported to have a millimeter wave pain beam. It’s similar to what the US has this active denial idea. Popular science even reported back in 2014 on it on China’s polywb millimeter wave system. It was an o they described it in popular science. You can look it up.”

Clayton buddy - Why not mention what was observed in Iraq & Kuwait in 1991, why discuss China? Why not talk aboutD.E.P.S. - Directed Energy Professional Society?

S0

S0 Why not mention PNAC and the 1980’s SDI Program, (Strategic Defense Initiative, also know as the “Star Wars” Program)?

S0

S0

S0 Interesting that the Institute for Space Cooperation (ICIS) was founded in 2001.

S0 Screenshots are from the documentary - 9/11 Alchemy Facing Reality - Rumble& YouTubelinks.

Then let me remind you of what Donald Trump stated in 2025, and over the years;

Now, just to ease off on the seriousness of this article, time for a musical interlude. Nikola Tesla, Dr John Trump and 9/11 - You’ll love this video;

And I’ll just leave this here for those of you that have never read Donald Trump’s books…

Clayton goes on to recount a scene from the original 1987 Robocop and here is the clip he was referring to;

Clayton then lays into the influencers on social media by stating the following; “But um so we are using these directed energy weapons. We have been for decades. This is not new news. And all those conservative influencers out there who are like, America is so back, no one will mess with us. Russia and China have these as well. In fact, they have different ones.

In fact, they have very advanced ones. So, this idea that like we’re we’re it we’re the only ones that have it. Okay, great. And you’re about to see a lot of this playing out now in Iran as well, where f we we know that Russia is there. Their their security services, their intelligence services are there, MSAD is there, MI6 is there, CIA is there. They’re all there. It’s like a spy playground right now in Iran. So maybe I see some more of these advanced technologies as well.

I mean, this is all pushing us towards disclosure, I’m sure. Um, and uh, we’ll see.

We’ll see. So, yeah, let me know your thoughts on that. Um, I know. I I just get so annoyed like, aren’t people on to this? How many of you guys in the chat room? Like I see a lot of you guys seeing that like in the chat room. All these like conservative influencers are on Twitter like they retweet like all these fake videos. Like what’s going on here? All these like MAGA influencers.

Like just to be clear like we are anti- party here on this show.

I mean the uni party is the demon of course and these intelligence the intelligence deep state runs the entire government and runs the show. So once you understand that and then you understand like all these like conservative influencers who get like Epstein binders and they get access to the Pentagon and they just sort of parrot the mockingbird media talking points makes them sound like they’re NBC News all of a sudden. It’s very curious and drives well that’s why that access is dangerous because it just makes them biased 100%.”

My question to you Clayton - Bias like most in the 9/11 “truth” movement are, that do not want to look at this? You talk about disclosure? What a bloody laugh!

Or how about the limited hangout disclosure of the UFO / UAP Guru’s like Dr Steven Greer?

Read: Secret Super Weapons, UFO’s & 9/11 - Scalar Waves, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Magnetic Electro Gravitic Nuclear Reactions.

S0 Clayton then goes off on press junkets - And Clayton, you’re the 9/11 COINTELPRO operations top “journalist” that is completely blind to YOUR OWN BIAS.

Clayton, sorry to break it to you, but YOU have also been taught to dance and walk the line when it comes to discussing September 11, 2001, just like the access journalism that you are attacking.

It’s hilarious to see what a hypocrite you are in real time.

Clayton goes on to state: “Um, that’s why we have so few members of Congress on our show, by the way. We’ve heard uh we’ve heard that press offices were unhappy with some of our questions of some of our of some of the members of Congress we’ve had on the show.

So, they’ve declined our invitation to have them back on.

So, when you see members of Congress on our show, which is infrequent, they are pretty brave. People like Tim Burchett or uh Congressman Thomas Massie.

So, I just want to put that out there. I just when you see this like access journalism BS, it drives it really gets under my skin. And by the way, it’s like the only the only news outlets that’ll have like Pam Bondi on or all these people are on Fox News because it’s all part of the mockingbird media because they know they’re going to favorably report. That’s it. That’s how this works. So, they’re not going to do any like negative reporting. Are you kidding me? Hell, Sean Hannity literally wears his CIA uh pin on his lapel on the show.”

Now, Clayton, talking about members of Congress, what is your take on the following conversation with Rep. Eric Burlison, a key player in Congress’s push for UFO / UAP transparency, after Ty Roberts had me on his show recently, and Ty started applying some intellectual humility.

S0Ty’s X post Also read: “Task Force on Federal Secrets”- Set up to fail? - Why the “Task Force on Federal Secrets” will NOT fully declassify the 9/11 files.

Clayton keeps going: “Like if you’re on social media and you’re seeing these clowns regurgitating Pentagon talking points or like CIA talking points about what’s happening in Iran or whatever, just just know where it’s coming from.

Just be aware of where it’s coming from.

**It’s not coming from a place of uh, of truth um, and well sourced journalism.$1

It’s coming from people within the administration. And it’s coming from the intelligence community who like slip things to reporters like, “Yeah, we’re hearing it’s bad in Iran.” Like lots of 200,000 people now dead. It’s a total lie. But then they just publish it. It’s a lie. Slipping them Epstein binders, right? It’s how they butter them up.”

Now Clayton, have you ever heard of Gordon Duff, senior editor of the magazine - Veteran’s Today, and what he had to say in 2012, when discussing Black Ops, National Security & 9/11, and how he touched on Richard Gage being an agent for the Defense Intelligence Agency, and that Dr Wood is RIGHT about what happened at the WTC on 9/11? You need to listen to this full conversation. It’s rather explosive, pardon the pun.

Dr Wood was and still is 20 years ahead of the curve, when she went to court in 2007 and self published her book in 2010. YET none of you ALT media hacks want to touch it.

Strangely enough after this conversation, Gordon Duff started promoting the provably false “nukes on 9/11” drivel, and this might just be the reason why;

Then when Clayton goes to the chat, it’s read out that Redacted is “controlled opposition”, to which he does not take kindly in the last two minutes of the episode…

Here is the clip, which need a further breakdown as this snippet is what kept me up last night and that caused me to see cracks in his demeanor…

After all Clayton, what was your question to Adam Eisenberg, the Pentagon whistle-blower you had on your show?

Read: Pentagon 9/11 Whistleblower on Redacted - US Army member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry.

Here’s my challenge to you Clayton - It’s time for some well sourced journalism…

This interview with 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza, and her open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement, has been out since December 26th and January 4th respectively, yet NOT ONE alternative media head has picked up on it yet…

S0Patricia’s humanitarian plea to stop the use of classified weapons, like those she believes were used on 9/11

Clayton, will you be Patricia’s hero$1Please listen to her plea below.

As Dr Wood states: “When people think you make them think, they will like you. When you really make them think, they will hate you.” Watch 9/11 The Essential Guide (1h)

Remember Covid and the whole “safe and effective” clown show?

S0Where did the towers go?

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as Substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

One of the best examples, as a template, is to investigate the 24 year long 9/11 narratives put out there, and when it comes to 9/11, there are 3 basic camps of truth awareness…

When someone goes out and proclaims that a successful year was having 83 podcasts in 12 months, the question is, are they spreading truth or are they spreading propaganda?

S0

S0

S0 Let’s take this 2011 interaction into consideration…

The denials in 2023… 📄 Read more here.

Then to fast forward to 2024, during the “most successful year” we had a podcaster make an astounding comment… Full interview

A long time Aerospace Engineer friend of yours, did a whole presentation pointing out huge problems with what you’ve been selling to over trusting truth seekers for the last two decades, during this “most successful year”.

As this was also revisited by other highly qualified professionals in 2010and 2025.

Yet you keep on pushing disproven theory and raking in millions. Have you no shame?

A Pentagon whistleblower came forward and spoke of his dismay to find out the following, by interacting with you, in your “most successful year”.

S0Adam Eisenberg on X @OrionProject911 While serving in the Army as a member of Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry, Adam Eisenberg spent approximately 240 hours on site, with at least a hundred of his fellow servicemen, at the Pentagon on 9/11. See a summary of his various interviews, here.

In January 2026 this interview dropped… Will you ignore this 9/11 Jersey Girl as well?

An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza

Read the January 2026 letter - full interview

You were asked difficult questions in December 2025, $1 **

Now for clarification, where do we draw the line? Who decides what 9/11 truth is?

What is the “IT” you are representing then, especially taking into account that whatever you’ve presented the last two decades, is overshadowed in these 500 pages?

What will 2026 hold, seeing your “$1” was 2024? **

When will you admit to the full totality of the deception on 9/11?

Clip above is an excerpt from the new book “ChatGPT and 9/11 - Operation Headfake: A Thought Experiment with Artificial Intelligence” co-authored by Dr Morgan Reynolds and John Herold, MA.

What does AI, when presented with a “fictional” scenario (which matches real events), reveal about the events of 9/11, the planning, and the cover up?

Here’s a link to the Kindle edition & a link to standard color printed edition.

Full discussion on the book can be found here.

See Chapter 43 about limited hangouts as well as Chapter 44 about the 9/11 truth movement.

S0

A LATE ADDITION TO THE ARTILE

I’m not sure how many of my readers know about the failed return of Richard Gage to AE911 at the end of 2025, and the shitshow that went down, so here is just a wee bit of an rundown…

Gage was invited back to AE911 to help save the organization, as it was in decline monetarily since Gage was kicked out in 2020 / 2021, and once Gage had a little bit of access to their systems, he immediately started removing podcast interviews poste etc that called foul of what happened at the Pentagon…

He also wanted to change the non-profit to a for profit organization, most probably so that the public cannot see how much money was being generated, and what is was being used for… Maybe my, DONATE NOW for disinformation, had something to do with it?

Long and short of it is, that the whole returning to AE911 fell flat on it’s face, and if you want more details, you’ll most probably be able to read the public statements on their respective websites, which I will NOT link, as they are the deceivers of truth seekers.

BUT…..

Andy Steele (15 years with AE911) and Craig McKee who were “running” AE911 for the last two years were kicked out of AE911. Craig McKee has already written about it on his various platforms, but now Andy Steele has broken his silence and it’s a hum dinger of a read… This is a short quote;

“Mix into that batter a sprinkling of aggressive personalities that, in my view, engaged in COINTELPRO style behavior (if you don’t know what that is, look it up), and a growing culture of thought control and unaccountability pushed in the name of “unity,” and you have a nice green spray of vomit spewed on every well-meaning and honest person that walks in through the 9/11 Truth Movement’s door.

Yes, I was run out from AE911Truth. Yes, I was treated like a condom you find under the couch two months after using it. Yes, they even put out an inaccurate narrative about my departure.” Read his full breakdown here

S0

And again, a little nugget from another 9/11 “truther” that keeps screaming unity, exposes his hypocrisy in a Zoom call on January 11, 2026 - More background here.

Is the “talk for hours” a reference to my discussion with 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza?

O, and this from November 16, 2025…

A statement from Patricia Casazza: “I once saw a great sign posted on a church lawn that read, “A half-truth is still a whole lie.”

No truer words have been said about the deceptions involving half-truths about 9/11”.

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Article

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening, and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as Substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

In 1990, or there abouts, new technology came out for us nerds wearing glasses, and due to being bullied at school for wearing very thick lensed glasses, my parents decided to get me some of this new to market, soft contact lenses. At that stage there was only glass contact lenses and due to my dad also having very bad eyesight, he used to wear the glass contact lenses when out on his dirt bike, but they weren’t great.

Because my dad had very bad eyesight, he opted for LASIK eye surgery, and his eyesight never really got to 20/20 vision and over the years all the negative effect of LASIK, like dry eyes, visual disturbances and not being able to see well at night.

The Vigilant Fox, posted this article - Scientists Accidentally Discover Laser-Free LASIK Alternative (I suggest you read the full article)

Then something in the article caught my eye, pardon the pun. The following;

The breakthrough happened entirely by chance when Hill and his collaborator, Dr. Brian Wong, a professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at the University of California–Irvine, were frustrated with their attempts to reshape cartilage using lasers.

Hill said they decided to try heating the material using an electric current but accidentally used a far smaller current than they intended. They expected to see the cartilage bubbling and shaking. However, when Wong touched the cartilage, $1, suggesting another effect was at play.

While Wong is a medical professional, Hill is a physical chemist, and it was their partnership that allowed them to connect the dots.

Low electrical currents change the pH of cartilage, loosening molecular bonds and making tissues more malleable.

“And it’s like, this is electrochemistry,” Wong said. “That’s hydrogen and oxygen being evolved, so the discovery was entirely by accident on cartilage — 100 percent by accident.”

Now where have I heard about electrical currents loosening molecular bonds and making matter more malleable? Hmmmmm?

I seem to remember Dr. Andrija Puharich, discussing the work of Nikola Tesla, where Tesla was able to change the molecular bonds of matter, so that metals would split, break, become soft as putty, glow white hot, but being cold to the touch. (2 min clip)

The friend Dr. Andrija Puharich is talking about is John Hutchison, who was living in Canada at the time, but now resides in the United states…

S0 John Hutchison got notoriety for his “Hutchison Effect”, as he was replicating the work of Nikola Tesla in his apartment, that basically was one big lab, filled with army surplus equipment, mostly from the Navy… His apartment didn’t have space for a mouse.

One of the most famous videos people know about is the following…

But did you know there is a second, similar video, that most people have never seen?

This video was unearthed by Math Easy Solutions, after visiting John Hutchison at his home, and John entrusted MES with a hard drive of all the videos, papers and more that John had in his possession. Watch his never before seen videos; follow this link.

In the 1990’s John got a lot of airtime from TV news…

Below you will hear the voice of Jeremy Rys, aka Alien Scientist, discussing the Hutchison Effect, but Jeremy took this off his socials, whilst he pretends to be a “free energy proponent” but when you want to talk 9/11 he vehemently opposes the work of John Hutchison, and ridicules Dr Wood’s evidence, as he pushes the thermite LIE.

Jeremy Rys was having a live chat on his channel, spouting a bunch of disinformation on 9/11, and then made the mistake of letting me talk to him mid podcast...

As soon as I made points he could NOT refute, he muted me, and went on an ad hominem tirade as all 9/11 “truthers” pushing the b/s thermite theory do...

• Alien Scientist vs 9/11 Revisionist 1.0
• Alien Scientist vs 9/11 Revisionist 2.0

After listening to the above video interactions, my guess is that he might be forced to play dumb. Read pages 36 to 41 in Andrew Johnson’s book - 📄 9/11 Holding the truth.

Here are just some of the metal samples John has produced.

S0Fingerprint left in a glowing piece of metal

S0Metal samples have been sent all over the world for study Similarities seen in the rubble at ground zero, and The Hutchison Effect, post 9/11

S0

S0

S0

S0 Listen to the creation of the plane shaped holes of the twin towers here.

S0Dr Wood visiting John in his lab in Canada Col. John Alexander set up a lab for John at Los Alamos in 1986.

John Alexander was also head of the non-lethal weapons department, and here is a clip from the documentary, Star Wars in Iraq (2006), investigating the allegations of the use of Directed Energy Weapons, during the fake war on terror… Notice Donald Rumsfeld and Col Meyers were asked about the roll out of DEW during the war on terror, and both get very uncomfortable. Pity that journalism isn’t what it used to be, eh?

In August 2024 Col John Alexander did a 5h interview with Shawn Ryan and they also touched on the “Hutchison Effect.” It’s a really interesting interview and you should make time to listen to it. Also, watch the movie: Men who stare at goats), as it is based on the research that Col. John Alexander was doing…

He also spoke of the work done in the 1960’s with microwaves and lasers…

When you do an internet search on the Hutchison Effect you will find your first bunch of results will be articles and videos “debunking” his work, stating it hasn’t been replicated, but he replicated it numerous times for TV programs that came to visit his lab.

S0

S0 Here is Bob Greenyer, taking on Jonathan Cole PE, with regards to how he too is replicating the work of John Hutchison. (5 minute clip)

What can we take from this article? America’s Electromagnetic and DEW Program has been running for decades, they’ve just been lying about it.

Before I sign off, here is a little bit of fun with AI, courtesy of John Herold.

Also see my attempt in creating a short form AI video here.

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

• 9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline. – Prof David A. Hughes.
• Dr David A. Hughes interview with 9/11 Revisionist.

Then I saw Richard giving a talk to a bunch of 9/11 “truthers” and it reminded me to reach out to him again and send him the open letter, from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza, to the US Government and the 9/11 “truth” movement.

• Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001. - An Open Letter.
• 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza speaks with 9/11 Revisionist.

I initially planned a presentation type interaction, where I would like to play him clips and get is reaction on them, but decided against that, as I would first like to get to know him, before delving deep into what I’ve summed up of what and who the protagonists in the 9/11 “truth” movement are.

I though a basic chat will be the best route to follow. What I am going to do however, is share the various clips I had ready in the bottom of this article, for your further perusal, as A LOT of the statements I made about the people I named, was captured on video in these clips, over the past couple of years.

You will also hear that Professor Ellefritz is bias towards the bomb / thermite angle, sold by Richard Gage, to over trusting truth seekers, and it’s tough for many people to admit to themselves they have been fooled.

I do have a question though: What would he, as a professor, say to a student in the class if they responded in the following way?

“Teacher, I flipped through some of the pages but didn’t read the book.” Is that student knowledgeable enough to speak about the content of that book?

Will the student get a passing grade or will he fail?

His paper: Ellefritz 2015 - Discourse Among the Truthers and Deniers of 9/11 - link

S0 Richard is also involved with the “International Center for 9/11 Justice”, suppression and if you are a regular reader of my articles, you will be well aware of what my position is on this organization, and that of Ted Walter and Piers Robinson.

I felt it necessary to share this interaction between Richard and Craig McKee, discussing the PentaCON event on September 11, 2001… (Recorded 8 January 2026)

Timestamps for the discussion;

00:00 - Who am I and how did I get into 9/11

00:35:40 - Do you know the work of Dr. David A. Hughes?

00:42:10 - 9/11 Revisionist getting into 9/11 and investigating the 9/11 truth movement

00:45:20 - Richard, have you read Dr Wood and Andrew Johnson’s books?

00:51:30 - The refusal of an evidence based discussion on 9/11 evidence

00:53:00 - The refuted “thermite in the dust” paper

00:57:15 - Richard Gage exposed during a 2023 truth summit

1:00:00 - Dr Morgan Reynolds and his stance on the alleged planes at the WTC

1:01:00 - Denis Rancourt and Bob Greenyer refutes the “thermite in the dust” paper

1:12:30 - The internal dynamics, the exclusion of critical voices to the dominant narrative

1:19:30 - The flawed $316 000 study of Building 7, commissioned by AE911 and seismic readings on September 11, 200

1:28:00 - The International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression’s upcoming “plane study” that will postulate remote controlled planes, which is provable bullshit

1:34:00 - People that don’t know, what they don’t know, and premeditated ignorance

1:43:00 - Joiners to movements aka slacktivists, and true activists

1:46:50 - Intellectual humility and making time to understand 9/11 evidence

1:48:00 - 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza and her open letter to the 9/11 truth movement

1:49:30 - Catherine Austin Fitts and the dangers of the weaponization of breakthrough energy

1:50:25 - Psychological Priming aka Predictable Programming and black-ops technology

1:58:15 - Richard’s call for an evidence based, 9/11 discussion of ALL available evidence

2:00:00 - The clown show debate between Gage and Fetzer and Gage’s best 9/11 disinformation year

2:02:45 - Jonathan Cole’s disingenuous “Where the Towers went” - read more

2:02:00 - The laughable “everything was ejected laterally for 600 feet” is debunked by the Thompson Plaza Sphere

2:05:00 - The forgotten stairwell B survivors and the 9/11 surfer

2:09:50 - No one talks about Big Power and how the 9/11 truth movement is COINTELPRO

2:15:00 - The proof I have of who and what the talking heads in the 9/11 “truth movement are

2:15:40 - Frustration with the obfuscation of the truth of what happened on 9/11 and the ramifications for our daily lives

2:18:05 - What is the most definitive talking points to wake people up to 9/11 truth?

2:22:30 - The lock step alternative media pushing bombs on 9/11 & Curt Weldon

2:28:00 - Open discussion and debates and the fall out after my DONATE TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation article

2:34:30 - The success of the 9/11 truth movement, moving people away from truth

2:36:20 - People’s intellectual dishonesty when searching for truth

2:38:00 - Richard needs to read my two thermite articles linked below

2:42:10 - An action plan for going forward with intellectual humility, seeing the flaws in the “thermite dust study paper”

2:45:00 - The shortcut of using Ai - Like Dr Morgan Reynolds and John Herold did, and what it would mean if Ai was truly truthful

After our discussion, I also sent the following additional resources he should work through.

• Dr Denis Rancourt: 2010 Death Blows to the 9/11 Nano-Thermite Hypothesis
• Ending the Nano-Thermite 9/11 Hypothesis for the World Trade Center Catastrophe
• Dr. James Millette’s 2012 WTC Dust Analysis
• Operation Headfake: September 11, 2001
• Dismantling the Criminocratic Cabal: The Truth Will Set Us Free

Supplementary clips and more background information to things I mentioned to Richard.

S0

S0

S0 The two Qui-Tam whistleblower cases you’re NOT supposed to know about and how that ties in to the Smith-Mundt Act and the dissemination of propaganda in the US.

HOW DARE YOU QUESTION 9/11 & Perception Management. (4 minutes)

2023 Interaction where a basic question cannot be answered. (3 minutes)

The difference between Observable Truth and the Perception of Truth. (4 minutes)

Perception Management and Steven E. Jones. (4 minutes)

The 9/11 “truth” movement arguments and the moving people AWAY from truth.

Jesse Ventura’s book report on “Where did the towers go?” (4 minutes)

Vietnam Veteran has David Ray Griffin phone into his TV show, discussing Building 6.

David Ray Griffin wants an one world government. A NEW WORLD ORDER. (4 min)

The iron rich molten iron-sphere disinformation. (47 seconds)

Niels Harrit and the scientifically flawed “thermite dust study paper”. (2 minutes)

The question you should not ask about Building 7, if you’re not a seismologist. (5 min)

How to sell a specific narrative to people, by leaving out key evidence.

S0 The disingenuousness of “truth seekers” that will NOT look at all the evidence. (5 min)

S0

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

Please be so kind as to leave a comment on the official TAP Talk upload to Rumble.

Description of the upload: One of the Jersey Girls who lost loved ones in the WTC Tower, discusses her evolution as a advocate for justice and accountability. We read her "open letter" to the truth community, to consider all the evidence, hang our "egos" at the door, and work together to do what's right.

How open should we be in the 9/11 truth movement about looking at all the evidence?

This was the theme of the evening. Judy Wood gets a lot of mention, which is contentious, but I think the group handled the hot topic pretty well. Some left the meeting in a huff, indicated on the chat. *(Richard Gage in particular.)

Copy / paste this link to see newsletters listed by date, promoting TAP Talks and Subscribe here to get the newsletter, straight to your inbox.

Tuesday TAP Talk! February 3 - With Special Guest, Adam Eisenberg, Pentagon whistleblower - 8PM ET / 5PM PT / 3AM CAT / 1AM UK - register your Zoom spot here.

Unfortunately there weren’t timestamps, but I’m planning to add some in the near future. The Q&A starts at the 2 hour 3 minute mark. Also see my interview with Patricia.

I also took the liberty of creating some extra clips, that I’ll be uploading to my socials, in order for you to be able to share them. I’ll add links to my socials in the coming days, but here are just a few;

A prolific statement: A half truth, is still a WHOLE LIE.

Richard Gage is a limited hangout when it comes to 9/11 truth, and Tucker Carlson’s 9/11 coverage teethers on being a PSYOP, to re-enforce the the government’s conspiracy theory, of what happened on September 11, 2001.

A reading of Patricia’s open letter to the 9/11 “truth” movement, and Orio Palmer’s observations, as he was ascending the South Tower, before he perished in the disintegration.

Patricia discusses the forgotten jumpers and how Dr Wood’s explanation makes sense.

9/11 Revisionist weighs in on what he’s seen in the 9/11 “truth” movement.

A most eloquent take on what happened on 9/11 by Jon Fortenberry…

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as Substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

Below is a VERY interesting October 10, 2012 video released by James Corbett;

The video includes a second title Episode 242: The Meaning of 9/11 Truth, yet he NEVER actually discusses what happened on 9/11, or the evidence presented to court, by Dr Judy Wood.

Instead, he appears to reveal some bread crumbs as to the advanced cold-DEW technology used on 9/11:

• References the infamous Donald Rumsfeld “Unknown Unknowns” and DEW clips.

S0

S0 • Shows a book in the background called “Black 9/11”.

S0 • Discusses the naming of the Manhattan Project.

S0 • Discusses space-based weapons capable of striking Earth like meteors.

S0 • Mentions the 1985 CNN Report on EMF Weapons.

S0

• Discusses theSecret Weapons used in Iraq.

S0 • Includes many more black budget technologies...

I highly recommend that you study my article: Secret Super Weapons and Sept 11, 2001 - Scalar, Electromagnetics, RF Weapons and Weather modification.

Now, seeing that James Corbett is well aware of these technologies and the the outcomes of deploying these weapons, then why would he act and say things like this, when asked about the evidence presented by Dr Judy Wood? (13 minutes)

In last year or two, it seemed like an apology might take place, after all, James’ sidekick, Media Monarchy, has shown some intellectual humility, in hindsight of how dismissive he was to the evidence the past 20 years, when he and Corbett were discussing the weird “forest fires”… (45 seconds)

Then Media Monarchy AGAIN apologized to Dr Wood, when discussing a “newly released angle of the North Tower disintegration”, in 2024… (3 minutes)

Media Monarchy also mentioned listening back podcasts, he listened to 20 years ago, when Dr Wood was interviewed by James Fetzer. (47 seconds)

Then let’s remind you of this nugget I found on James Fetzer, before he started spewing his drivel of nukes being the destructive force on September 11, 2001. (6 min)

Now, dear James Corbett - A prolific statement: A half truth, is still a WHOLE LIE.

James, have you bothered to read the open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement, from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza? Read it here.

A reading of Patricia’s open letter to the 9/11 “$1” movement, and Orio Palmer’s observations, as he was ascending the South Tower, before he perished in the disintegration. (10 minutes) Full TAP Talk interview here.

James Corbett, isn’t it time that you come clean and admit that you have err’d in your coverage of 9/11, and indirectly added to the further cover-up of 9/11 truth, by aligning yourself with provable disinformation peddlers?

S0

Additional resources:

• 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline - “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” - Vladimir Lenin
• 9/11 Truth’s Protective Layers Unmasked - The cover-up and the vast network continuing to suppress the real 9/11 truth

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as Substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

In short, he helped clean up the mess from the plane crash. Except that, well, there was no plane, he argues. He has also identified people of interest, who could be behind the cover-up and execution of the PentaCON event.

This is what his extensive research the last couple of years have uncovered and how he has been treated by the 9/11 “truth” movement talking heads.

Please support TAP, by leaving a comment on their Rumble upload and share it.

Also read and check out the following;

• Pentagon 9/11 Whistleblower on Redacted
• The PentaCon on 9/11 - When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target
• Highlight reel and links to Adam’s other interviews, over the years.
• Interview with OEFSOFSOLDIER - 9/11 Pentagon First Responder & whistleblower

Screenshot below of a third PentaCON whistleblower.

S0

Then, if you are a regular reader of my Substack, you’ll be well aware, I love giving you more food for thought with video’s that I mash together.

The full CNN broadcast and not the edited version people get on the internet. (2 min)

What causes spontaneous fires? (3 minutes)

The impossible approach to hit the Pentagon; (3 minutes)

The miracle wings of Flight 77; (4 minutes)

The impossible cellphone calls on Flight 77; (4 minutes)

A Pentagon Security Video Analysis finds the video has been altered; (5 minutes)

S0

S0

S0

S0

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as Substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

My long form discussion with Patricia in December 2025 - Watch here

Patricia’s open letter - Read it here

Additional resources:

• 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline - “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” - Vladimir Lenin
• 9/11 Truth’s Protective Layers Unmasked - The cover-up and the vast network continuing to suppress the real 9/11 truth

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as Substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “$1”.**

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

Isn’t it interesting how Gene Laratonda wants to push the government narrative for the hoodwink at Shanksville and the PentaCON. I’ve written extensively on Gene Laratonda, just search his name under my archive tab of articles.

Even in their first article, where the following statements were made, left me chuckling.

“We are an independent research, education, and advocacy group dedicated to exposing the truth about the crimes of September 11, 2001. In addition to honoring the work of researchers who have established key facts — such as the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center — we focus on decisive evidence that has been marginalized or suppressed, particularly relating to the Pentagon and Shanksville events.

We reject false narratives promoted by governments and media institutions, and we also challenge disinformation and gatekeeping within the 9/11 Truth Movement itself. Our work is guided by evidence, integrity, and the conviction that real unity can only be built on truth.

Our work focuses on evidence that challenges the official narrative and on lines of inquiry that have been marginalized, avoided, or actively suppressed — both outside and within the 9/11 Truth Movement. We aim to clarify what has been deliberately obscured, and to advance serious, evidence-based discussion where confusion and caution have too often prevailed.”

Key facts of “controlled demolition” of the World Trade Center, REALLY? Hmmmm.

Pity, these 43 FACTS seem to counter that idea, as well as the testimony of this controlled demolition expert, with 30+ years experience, stating that what we saw on 9/11 WAS NOT due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes… I also wrote a piece on how the building collapse in Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers, showing you just how easily people are duped, who don’t know any better.

Here is my response I would like to have the members of this new organization to take note of, but alas, their inclusivity is already proven to be a sham, as I’m blocked from commenting, by the founder Craig McKee… The one with the glasses in this clip;

My comment:

Do you know who the 4 Jersey Girls are, and how they were instrumental in forcing the Bush administration to open an investigation into the events of September 11, 2001, that brought us the gaslighting 9/11 Commission Report?

S0 Do you have any semblance of empathy for the people who lost loved ones at the World Trade Center on that fateful day, never mind the millions killed in a FAKE war on terror, for over 20 years?

Now, ask yourself this: Isn’t there some validity in the opinion of someone who has been in the thick of things, going into the DC swamp to get justice and accountability for the murder of nearly 3000 innocent victims in the Towers, and the 343 first responders, who is now speaking out about the obfuscation of truth, by the self appointed 9/11 “truth” movement talking heads and a number of poo-ba organisations.

A 9/11 “truth” movement, that is PROVABLY infiltrated by COINTELPRO agents and alternative media heads that have NOT done their due diligence, when investigating all the available evidence that was brought to COURT in 2007.

So, maybe it’s time you apply some intellectual humility and revisit what you think you know and consider information you were brainwashed not to look at.

When it comes to the 9/11 narrative, Patricia summed it up well in our long form interview we did in December 2025 – “A half-truth, is still a WHOLE LIE”.

It’s also true with regards to only looking at certain anomalies at the WTC and not everything. Read her letter and get back to me…

Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001

An open letter to the US Government & the 9/11 truth movement from 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza – January 2026 - Read the letter here

An interview with Patricia, Monday, February 9th.

9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza discusses her open letter with Sonia Poulton

A half truth, is still a WHOLE LIE. – Patricia Casazza - Interview

S0 There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11

1. Problem solving skills

2. Group Think

3. They just can’t handle the implications

Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.

Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.

The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.

The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.

The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.

Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by “experts” in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the “truth” movement, but these “experts” spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence. Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow.

Now what was interesting to see how Mystic Bazaar was treated, when she commented on this latest article, and surprise surprise, the comments have been deleted.

S0

S0

S0

S0 A comment from Mystic Bazaar on this interaction;

They are saying we are a new group looking at all the evidence, but in the next breath saying “but not that evidence”. Even my ChatGPT said they don’t have any evidence just claims of “controlled demolition”, and Dr Wood presents evidence, but her evidence doesn’t agree with their theory, so they will dismiss it. The article says the right things, but immediately in the comments dismisses evidence that proves what AE911 say is BS, so they are just another version of AR911truth and the International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression, probably wanting funding again.

I only responded because I started looking into all the disinfo more now, as I know the basics and who is full of BS, but not gone into details, and seeing the claims made in that article then the comment completely dismissing Dr Wood’s evidence, angered me, lol. Dr Wood would have included any evidence that may have supported their claims in her investigation. She wouldn’t have left out easilly observable evidence and data in her work, grrrrr.

I also highly recommend you read Mystic’s latest article: Perception Management Inside the So-Called 9/11 Truth Movement.

S0 This clip also comes in handy.

And then for you my readers, please consider the following statement I made on the Sonia Poulton Show, this past Monday, February 9th.

The litmus test for anyone discussing 9/11 truth is, that if they are NOT discussing the EVIDENCE presented to COURT in 2007, by Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Judy Wood, then they are suspect and or pushing a certain narrative, that will in the end, take you AWAY from 9/11 truth.

• Dr Reynolds' 2007 case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports.
• Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex.

What is concerning is that this organization is wanting to position itself as a bastion of truth in exposing the hoodwink at Shanksville and the PentaCON, yet we already see that they are disingenuous with their censoring of dissident voices and they sure as hell will not be discussing EVIDENCE presented by the PentaCON whistleblowers, Adam Eisenberg, OEFSOFSOLDIER and Dam Blue.

S0 And whatever you do, don’t go against the leader of the 9/11 “truth” cult that cannot count past three, with the leader Richard Gage, or be ostracized. Yet more and more longtime supporters are seeing through Richard Gage, and if you are not keeping an eye on the happenings behind the scenes and various echo chambers, you’ll miss it.

This is an interesting reveal on the part of Richard Gage, when Mike Zarzano, from TAP (Truth Action Project), challenged Richard Gage in December 2025.

So, I again will remind you of the following;

A whole industry has been created - A whole “truth” movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes, at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives, that are being SOLD to them.

Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.

S0 An interesting interaction on X, just last night, February 12th, 2026 - Link & Full thread

S0 Questions for Gene Laratonda.

Who did NIST pay to investigate, write reports and create the NIST Report?

What big club are the 23 NIST subcontractors part of? You can read more here.

I highly recommend you also read: The 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

He summarized his "three camps" framework in the following clip of a recent interview.

I really like Dr Hughes’ three camp model, as I referenced and included it in at least eight articles between June 2025 and January 2026, but the three camp model isn’t really that new, as it’s basically just a rewording of what truth seekers have always seen with regards to official narratives being presented to us, and I can relay it back to an article penned in 2007, by CB Brooklyn, when looking at the events of September 11, 2001 and that was published on Andrew Johnson’s website and reproduced in my article, 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline, with a couple of relevant updates. From the article;

There are three basic versions of the 9/11 events.

Although differences and / or overlapping may occur, the following three versions generally describe what most people believe:

1. OGCT: This is known as the “Official Government Conspiracy Theory”.

This version states that a guy from a cave in Afghanistan conspired with 19 box cutter-wielding Muslims to hijack airplanes, outwit the USA’s entire multi-trillion dollar defense system, and cause the Twin Towers to collapse. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the truth of 9/11.

2. APCT. I call this the “Alternate Propaganda Conspiracy Theory”.

This version states that, more or less, there were hijackings on 9/11, but the planes might have been taken under remote control to ensure they crashed as planned. Airplanes most likely crashed at the Pentagon and Shanksville, but planes definitely did crash into the Twin Towers. The Twin Towers and WTC 7 collapsed from conventional explosives and thermite, and molten metal was found in the rubble. This is the version pushed by the government and media as being the “wacko conspiracy theory” that the “truth movement” believes.

3. REAL.

This, simply, is the REAL version, backed by actual evidence, Laws of Physics, and common sense: There were no hijackings, no plane crashes, and the WTC complex (not just the Towers and WTC 7) was destroyed with Directed Energy Technology, the “ACME D System”. The government and media steer clear of these.

As per CB Brooklyn’s three versions, Dr Hughes makes a similar distinction between his three camps model, by stating; “The distinction between the three camps is not intended to be hard and fast. Individuals can move backwards and forwards between camps, depending on circumstance.”

Under the heading of his article: Identifying Those in Camp 2 – Propaganda Techniques - He states; For those who have left Camp 1, and are aware of Camp 3, the challenge is how to spot those in Camp 2.

The rest of this article proposes guidelines for how to do so. Although certain names are named, the aim is not to produce a list of whom to trust and whom not to trust. I may have got it wrong in some cases. You should not rely on my judgment.

Rather, the aim is to provide a list of criteria that readers can apply when making their own assessments of which commentators are authentic and reliable and which are not. The aim is to get readers to think in a more structured and critical way about the “alternative media” they are consuming.”

When Dr Hughes’ and I were discussing the events of September 11, 2001, in September 2025, we were discussing Narrative vs. evidence; Dr Morgan Reynolds; Mark Conlon aka 9/11 Planes Research; Shanksville; the Pentagon; Curt Weldon; survivors on Stairwell B; Richard Gage; Camp 2 propaganda techniques; the 9/11 Memorial Museum.

Here is a short clip from that discussion, pertaining to Camp 2 propaganda techniques;

Dr Hughes, mentions the power that is derived from forming organizations, to give the people the impression that they are supporting an organization that will truly be searching for the truth and I have recently penned, Are You Really Exposing 9/11? - wherein I point out that the “new kid on the block”, is just another gaslighting exercise that will be leading people AWAY from 9/11 FACTS, all whilst happily taking people’s donations, and receiving nothing noteworthy in the pursuit of accountability for the events of September 11, 2001. Read my article, DONATE TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation - Where is the money going?

Make sure to listen to the clip with Sarah & Thomas Corriher, who both volunteered at AE911, and saw a lot of weird things going on, as well as the people working for AE911, which was recorded over 11 years ago. The 48 minutes will blow your mind!

Dr Hughes also discusses funding for nonprofits and he seems to have delved a bit deeper into the funding, after my article, DONATE TODAY for 9/11 Disinformation and he uncovered the following;

“For example, only 40% of the income for the International Center for 9/11 Studies (operating as the International Center for 9/11 Justice) comes from “public support” (see Part II, Section C, 14). Where does the other 60% (i.e., $120,000 of tax-exempt funding) come from?

$10,000 of IC911J funding in June 2024 came from DAFgiving360, formerly known as the Schwab Charitable Fund, which has service agreements with subsidiaries of the Charles Schwab Corporation. For any critical thinker, this should raise alarm bells.”

Then Dr Hughes writes the following, under the heading: Evidence of Cult Thinking;

“Camp 1 works through techniques of cult indoctrination, and so too, in certain instances, does Camp 2.

This typically manifests in a closed-mindedness whereby demands are made that you agree completely with a particular position / theory / commentator.

Doctrinal purity is involved: it is not enough to agree with only part, or even most, of the doctrine being advanced. Rather, the doctrine is to be accepted in its entirety, and is to become central to one’s worldview.

If any of these conditions are not met, the Camp 3 critical thinker typically gets attacked.

We see this, for instance, in the aggressive behaviour of certain “no virus” proponents (I am agnostic on the issue, but I object to being bullied into conformity).

It surfaced again recently in Andrew Johnson and 9/11 Revisionist’s attack on me for not accepting absolutely every element of Where Did The Towers Go? I was outrageously likened to Jim Fetzer and described as “silly” and perhaps “not a good guy.” Johnson wrongly claimed that I refuse to challenge all three of climate change, global energy, and terrorism narratives. I was bizarrely blamed for being “prolific” and for having a Powerpoint presentation ready for an interview that was agreed nine months in advance.

Because I dare to challenge the Hurricane Erin hypothesis and the significance of Wood’s magnetometer data, while remaining agnostic on the Hutchison effect, I appear to be persona non grata in the Wood camp — despite having published multiple overt defences of her work.

I first presented my counter-evidence in an article that was proof-read by Johnson himself (see the acknowledgement at the end). I did the intellectually honest thing by running my doubts past him first before publishing. But instead of rebutting my specific, evidence-based concerns point by point, Johnson and 9/11 Revisionist resorted to smears, innuendo, and ad hominem. Such behaviour is not conducive to the pursuit of the truth.”

I have a question Dr Hughes, Am I now part of a cult? Like Fetzer always talks about?

What about the cult that cannot count past three? No mention of them? Maybe you haven’t read my article on the Camp 2 cult in the 9/11 truth movement? Read it here.

Did you not state the following in your article, “No but”;

S0 I do have to voice my dismay of Dr Hughes making the statement that Andrew Johnson and I “attacked him”. Really, attacked?

Andrew Johnson pointed out some differing opinions, of the opinions Dr Hughes has, where I basically tried to DEFEND Dr Hughes.

For a response to what Dr Hughes had to say about the interview that Andrew Johnson and I had, in December 2025, Andrew Johnson has the following response to Dr Hughes, in his latest upload to YouTube.

Here is a one minute summary of what Andrew Johnson has to say to Dr Hughes.

It’s IMPERATIVE that you listen to Andrew’s FULL breakdown of what Dr Hughes had to say in his article. (15 minutes)

What jumped out at me is how Dr Hughes is inadvertently disseminating disinformation about Dr. Wood's book, claiming Hurricane Erin is a "theory" or "hypothesis". It is not just a difference of opinion.. It is teethering on disinformation.

Dr Hughes refers to "the Judy Wood Camp", for being angry for his criticism of Dr Wood's book. But at the same time, are we not allowed to disagree with what Hughes is saying?

So, we are not allowed to disagree with "the David Hughes Camp"?

It seems that for Dr Hughes, it’s about camps, not evidence -- and that is how he seems to “debunk” evidence.... which could be seen as part of a cover up.

Listening to this part multiple times makes it clear that Hughes is like an orchestra director -- over everyone. By insulting you for “defending Judy Wood” (not standing up for evidence), he tries to bully people away from certain pieces of evidence.... lest they be insulted, for blindly by supporting Dr Judy Wood.

It really gives you a feeling that this could a psyop that he’s running.

It’s manipulative to put people in camps.

Either you are interested in the truth or you are not. So where does that put Dr Hughes?

Referring to the evidence of a hurricane as a “theory” disqualifies him as someone seeking the truth, for most people. Next he might refer to the missing debris as “Wood’s missing debris theory”. And on and on it goes, and soon Dr Wood will have no credibility in the eyes of Dr Hughes’ audience.

It is important not to speculate. So what is Hughes doing with his mini-micro-nano-mini-nukes or thermite or... whatever he’s now pedaling?

Either you are seeking the truth to expose it, or you re trying to cover it up.

Dr Hughes’ speculating in several directions, which makes it seem that he is trying to muddle up and cover up the FACTS, albeit inadvertently.

Also, in Dr Hughes’ article, Reflections on 2025 - Life in the Alternative Media Is Not What It Seems, he stated the following;

“I had accidentally arranged an interview with Elze van Hamelen of Solari Report on a bank holiday in early May. The theme of the interview was the implications of Dr. Judy Wood’s research on the destruction of the Twin Towers.

We should have rearranged, but I insisted on pressing ahead despite feeling exhausted, having published my reply to Wallace less than 48 hours earlier. Although I made relevant points regarding the AE911T psy-op, I stumbled towards the end when referring to a “cold fusion mini-nuke.” Andrew Johnson rightly picked me up on the conceptual imprecision.”

So, what is it Dr Hughes, do you agree you made a mistake in that interview with Elze van Hamelen and that Andrew Johnson was correct in picking up on conceptual imprecision regarding to referring to a “cold fusion mini-nuke”, but one cannot point out other conceptual imprecisions, when taking your stance on hurricane Erin, the anomalies with the earth’s magnetic field, the Hutchison Effect and the damage to the 9/11 orphans, Buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building on 9/11?

Let’s have a listen to what James Fetzer had to say in relation to Dr Wood’s work initially, in the to clips below, before he ended up stabbing her in the back, and even threatening her, when she started talking about energy effects and the Hutchison Effect.

Now, for more context… Let’s listen to James Fetzer’s reaction when I challenged him in May of 2025, in the Q&A of a Boston 911 presentation he did. (5 minutes)

What we take from this is a talking head that was positioning himself as an ally of Dr Wood, that ended up turning into a foe of Dr Wood.

Now I AM NOT implying that Dr Hughes is a foe, but his position of wanting to dismiss the evidence presented by Dr Wood is concerning, to say the least.

Dr Wood states: “To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence...”

These points of contention that Dr Hughes has, I did want to take up with him, when we had our discussion in September 2025, but thought it wouldn’t be productive to argue with someone that I deem an ally to the work of Dr Wood.

Now, unfortunately Dr Hughes has made a false claim that I attacked him, which I do not appreciate, and thus I need to make some of the following observations and NO this is NOT an attack, but positive criticism.

1. You can’t unsee what you see

1. You can’t unknow what you know

1. Facts have trajectory

1. Truth has conclusions

1. There must be consequences.

Applying these to Dr Hughes establishes him to be leaning more to camp 2 thinking when discussing what happened on 9/11.

Like all the other limited hangout traitors, Tucker Carlson, James Corbett, Ted Walter, Alex Jones, Stephen Jones, Richard Gage etcetera.

1. The scooped out damage signature of WTC6 was seen

1. The damage to the 9/11 Orphans is NOT from known technology like explosives, fire 🔥, or falling debris or mini nukes

1. The damage at WTC6 is from a publicly unknown technology / weapon and undeniable and NOT falling debris, as Dr Hughes implies in his article, Reflections on my Visit to the World Trade Centre Site, May 2025

1. That unknown weapon was deployed by an entity, and shielded from investigation.

1. All levels of government are responsible and wholly ILLEGITIMATE. All government members are full spectrum traitors, must be held accountable to THE MOST EXTREME punishment. As Soon As Possible, at a minimum as they are part of the cover-up, same as the so called 9/11 ‘truth” movement.

1. The Secret in Plain Sight: The Twin Tower’s Sphere - The Austin J. Tobin Plaza 27 foot high Sphere reveals truth most just cannot handle - The steel turned to DUST, before it even hit the ground.

S0 One thing to remember is that the 9/11 Truther movement was not infiltrated. It was set up for the very purpose it is serving. To move truth seekers AWAY from looking at the EVIDENCE of what happened on September 11, 2001.

What have the Truthers accomplished? Not much, but they sure raked in millions!

It’s a question that 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza has raised herself… (5 minutes)

Something that is very troubling to me is the fact that I sent Dr Hughes an email on 14 January 2026, asking him to help getting more eyes on the open letter Patricia Casazza penned, yet no response back and no promotion of the letter, that is a death blow and expose of the limited hangouts in the 9/11 truth movement.

After all, wouldn’t Dr Hughes’ guide to spotting those in Camp 2, be able to use this open letter a great example to spotting those in Camp 2?

9/11 IS THE LITMUS TEST.

Taking all of my critiques into account, it seems that Dr Hughes has not carefully read Dr Wood’s book. Dr Wood does not have a conclusion about a "Hurricane Hypothesis." That is something Dr Hughes dreamed up out of whole cloth and he’s misrepresenting what Dr Wood presents in her book.

Dr Wood discussed how people misrepresent her hurricane Erin evidence, during her September 2025 interview on the PBD podcast; (50 seconds)

See my breakdown of the interview, as it’s a scathing attack on the disingenuous host of the PBD podcast. Read more here.

There are MANY things Dr Hughes gets wrong and I think it would be a very interesting conversation to be had between Dr Hughes, Dr Wood, Andrew Johnson and I will gladly moderate such a discussion, but what would Dr Wood do? Read her book to him? If he isn't able to read for himself, there is nothing she can do to help him.

Another sign that he hasn't read her book fully, is that he seems to be promoting "squibs". He does not appear to have seen the "squirt" discussion in her book. The “squirts” are the dustified building squirting out. To squash the whole building down in 8 seconds or even 9.22 seconds, midway down the squirts would need to be greater than Mach 1, if all the windows were removed, as one would expect in a conventional controlled demolition.

S0Please see page 111 to 114 of Dr Wood’s book, Where did the towers go? People also make the statement; “Arguments about the use of weaponry for the existence of which we have no definitive evidence, continue to distract from the overwhelming evidence that we do have for controlled demolition on 9/11."

So, do people also think Trump is lying about having advanced weaponry because he hasn't seen it on display somewhere? (How dumb!)

I’ll remind you to read my article - America’s Electromagnetic and DEW Program, The program has been running for decades, they’ve just been lying about it - as I point to the 1985 CNN investigative report on RF weaponry, the use of exotic black-ops technologies in Panama 1989, the use of DEW in Iraq in 2003, how uncomfortable the Pentagon was in answering questions about it in 2003, the alleged use against the people of Lebanon in 2006, just to name a few. I suggest you work through that article.

What did Dr Hughes have to say in his presentation: In Defence of Judy Wood - Judy Wood is one of the most maligned researchers in the world, because her research points towards scientific truths with global revolutionary implications. (4 minutes)

I think Dr Hughes’ suggestion in his article that nanothermite destroyed the towers should be pointed out. To me it’s very clear that he says Camp 3 (aka DJW et al) is claiming that.

S0 See Grok AI also stating the same about the meaning of his wording. Read more here.

S0

The section heading describes himself, as well: “Ignoring / Downplaying / Twisting of Counter-Evidence”. After all, what has he been doing with the anti-hurricane nonsense?

Near the beginning of his article, Dr Hughes says this: "Contrary to claims that Wood presents a “theory” that directed energy weapons were what destroyed the Twin Towers, she does nothing of the kind. Instead, in the vein of genuine forensic investigation, she looks carefully at evidence and considers its implications."

Then later down, he claims Dr Wood has a hurricane hypothesis? Does Dr Hughes have a multiple-personality disorder? Did multiple people write this article?

Also, Dr Hughes misquotes Dr Wood. Actually, it’s an implied quote; “Wood suggests that Hurricane Erin, sitting just off the coast of New York at the time of the attacks, could, like..." I don't think Dr Wood has ever referred to the events of 9/11 as an "attack".

Dr Hughes actually made the case for Dr Wood! Why did he use a hurricane image from 20 years AFTER the event? The media had to start putting Hurricane Erin info out there, so that Dr Wood’s work wouldn’t shock people so much.

S0 Why does Dr Hughes use an image POSTED 20 years later? Because he couldn’t find such an image posted in 2001.

He also implies that Dr Wood says the buildings were “struck.” NOPE. She most often referred to when the buildings got their (airplane-shaped) holes. (4 minute clip)

Then during the Q&A of her 2012 Breakthrough Energy Conference presentation, in the Netherlands, Dr Wood was asked about the alleged planes. (1 minute)

She was also asked about the Hutchison Effect and “cold fusion” and how both are relevant to what happened on September 11, 2001.

I’ll repeat Dr Wood’s statement: “To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence...”

S0 AGAIN: This is NOT an attack on Dr Hughes, but an open dialogue, in the search for 9/11 truth and accountability.

I am NOT Dr Hughes enemy, and I hope he sees this article as positive criticism.

I look forward to discussing these points, if he’s open to a discussion.

Dr Hughes’ response can be read here.

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

Math Easy Solutions downloaded and combined all 500 PDFs of 9/11 firefighters, paramedics, and EMT witness testimony from the NY Times archive and combined them into a searchable 7,058 page PDF!

Something to keep in mind when working through all of these testimonies;

‘To determine what happened on 9/11, all available evidence must be considered. We cannot pick and choose which observable facts we may want to explain and then ignore the others. Any explanation must consider all the available evidence...” - Dr Judy Wood.

I have written two articles so far, that covered some of the testimonies, and I would request that you read the two following articles, before reading further;

• Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11 - Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts.
• The Sounds of Explosions on 9/11 - Was every BOOM a BOMB?

I would like to bring some of the testimonies to your attention, with the following clips;

You can watch the 1h 30 minute documentary here.

EMT Jessica Maldonado;

S0 Question: How does fire in two huge skyscrapers, cause vehicles to spontaneously combust?

What you would have learned, if you read my two articles above, is that the testimonies point to very strange effects, that cannot be explained by any thermal or kinetic mechanisms and today, I just want to focus on one testimony, seeing most ‘truth seekers” will never take the time to read through 7 000 pages of testimonies, to find all of the testimonies that could be used to prove the various anomalies seen by these witnesses, that CANNOT be explained by two planes flying into buildings, or the use of thermite, bombs or nukes, to cause the destruction witnessed at the World Trade Center complex on September 11, 2001.

At the end of this testimony, I’ll be pointing out some interesting observations in this first responder’s testimony, so be sure to scroll down all the way, it’s a long and disturbing testimony.

Let’s read the testimony of LIEUTENANT RENE DAVILA, October 12, 2001, Transcribed by Laurie A. Collins - 📄 The NY Times archive PDF - File No. 9110075

It’s important to keep in mind, about 8 pages of testimony has been redacted, why?

MR. ECCLESTON: Today’s date is October 12th, 2001. The time is 12:20 hours.

This is Christopher Eccleston of the Fire Department of New York City. I’m conducting an interview with the following individual. Please state your name, rank, assigned command of the Fire Department of the City of New York.

LIEUTENANT DAVILA: Lieutenant Rene Davila, shield number 328, lieutenant in Battalion 04, Fire Department of New York.

MR. ECCLESTON: Also present in the room is. MS. BASTEDENBECK: Christine Bastedenbeck of the New York City Fire Department.

Q. Lieutenant Davila, were you assigned World Trade disaster on September 11th, 2001?

A. I was assigned or I put myself on assignment immediately after I heard the transmission of the plane hitting the tower.

Q. Can you tell me about the events of that day?

A. Okay.

R . DAVILA

Q. Start from the top.

A. Actually just prior to the plane hitting tower one, I was in the office communicating with Lieutenant Bill Melarango. I just happened to be standing over the desk when I heard one of my units, “01 Charlie,” put a priority message over the frequency stating that the plane just hit the tower. Seconds later I heard another one of my units, “01 Adam,” yelling the same thing. I immediately put myself on the assignment. I ran out, jumped in the vehicle, starting responding. When I got over to Rutgers and South Street, I was able to see the building.

I saw a big hole, what appeared to me at that time to have been a fire or probably secondary to an explosion. I confirmed there was an incident.

I couldn’t confirm it was a plane because I didn’t see the plane.

Immediately I confirmed the incident. I was over the citywide frequency. Basically I started calling for resources. I told them immediately to alert the senior staff. I told

them to get the MERV rolling, start sending all available units to that location. Being around during the bombing, I basically knew we had an incident which was going to generate a great many patients. I couldn’t tell you exactly what floor it was. I couldn’t tell you how many floors were gone but there was a good portion of the building that was definitely destroyed. So I knew we had some casualties and fatalities.

Responding now -- what do you want me to talk about? Do you want me to talk about

personal feelings too?

Q. Sure. Everything.

A. Well, as far as I feel, a lot of personal feelings came. Personally I always thought about -- you know you see that guy on 911 or something like that and he’s a hero or something and he’s a big shot or whatever. I know for myself -- I can’t speak for somebody else -- yeah, I’m going to be like that. Well, I was given the opportunity to be that guy, and I immediately did not want it. As I’m driving, I’m driving and I’m also talking on the frequency. But I remember that coming through my mind.

I also thought of Lieutenant Tony Torres, first of all because he’s from the battalion, second of all because he’s Hispanic, but next he was the first responding supervisor to the bombing at the World Trade Center towers.

Going through all those thoughts and stuff also, I started trying to think logistically, trying to think of how we were taught. Preplans, I don’t even know if they existed since the merger. However, I still think that way.

So when I traveled down there, I was trying to go ahead and get down there where I could get down by Vesey Street. Vesey, as far as I remember, is the preplan for our staging area. I remember I ran down, I came down around across by Beekman Hospital and made a right over on Beekman Street and went up. I did a couple turns across Broadway. I ended up coming down Vesey.

Right over here, right before the union is normally where we would have set up staging, but it appears when the towers got hit that a lot of debris already was in that street and in that area . Alot of debris was flyin g around there, and it definitely wasn’t, if anything, as safe to set a staging. Plus I noticed that all the other apparatus and stuff was still continuing on over t o West Street.

So I continued on to West Street, made a left - hand turn , and I set the first -- staging and command post basically -- you’ve got West Street . I was on the eastside of West Street.

I was setting staging of my units, and I had my command right over here, pretty much adjacent to the rescue that was running into tower one.

Q. That’s where you parked your vehicle then?

A. That’s where I originally parked my vehicle .

Q. Can you just indicate that by a number 1 on the map?

A. Trade Center one, Trade Center two. So I’ll be like number 1.

Q. So you parked your vehicle there.

A. Right.

Q. And you tried to establish a command post there?

A. That’s what I had given directions. Right behind, right on the other side of the

median there was the bus of 01 Charlie. I couldn’t see my other unit, 01 Adam, which later I found out they were actually on Liberty Street. A couple other voluntaries were starting to arrive at that time, but I remember going over to 1 Charlie because they were my unit. I went to the back of the vehicle. They had about six -- is my language permissive?

Q. Whatever you want to say.

A. This is exactly the way I talk. I ran to the back of the vehicle, and I said, “What the fuck you got?” No, I saw the patient in the back of the vehicle. I saw some people with difficulty breathing. Nobody was on 02. I didn’t see no amputation or anything at that point. I already knew that there was that type of patient coming out, because when I first went 84 on the scene and advised citywide, one or two people leaving the tower, I’d seen a couple of amputations.

I’d seen a couple body parts in the street coming towards that location. I saw people coming completely burnt at me where their clothes were singed off with burns, probably from one to fourth degree going down into the bone. They were walking to me, and I was immediately going, “Walking wounded, you go down that way across the street.”

I went in the back of 1 Charlie. I said, “Do your patients walk?” He said, “Yeah.”

“Tell them to get the fuck out and run that way.” At that time I told him to close the door to the vehicle and pull every triage tag that they had available. I started just yelling at them, “Triage, triage, triage.”

Then as the other units were responding in, all I was telling them is -- they were like -- everybody was trying to run to grab a patient. I said absolutely not. I think that was one of the most difficult things I had. In fact, right now today, I was talking at roll call to people about triage and the importance of triage. I said, “Triage, triage, triage.”

There were a couple AMR units there. I think the next unit I saw was a St. Vincent’s paramedic unit, and the same thing again.

They’re serious. I don’t care. Triage, triage, triage.

At that time I went ahead and I noticed already I was losing my voice. I grabbed the crew of 1 Charlie. I knew these two guys. I told both of them to stick to me like glue. One of them was the staging officer. The other one had to stay with me because he was going to be my voice. Just in case I lost my voice completely, at least I was able to talk through him and he would have been able to communicate for me.

The onset from the time I was basically trying to grab a hold to try to get an ICS system operating. I knew senior staff was responding.

I have to be honest, when I first got there, the first thing I did was get out of my vehicle and look to see if I saw another light blue shirt. I was hoping somebody else got there before me. That’s what I was actually hoping. But no, to my dismay, there was no one else there.

Q. Who did you make this staging officer?

A. The staging officer was EMT Alex Loutsky.

Q. Who was the other

A. As a matter of fact, you’ll probably see him. He’s in the press paper. He’s downstairs too.

Q. Who was the person that stayed with you?

A. He was the one that just went out ill, secondary probably to this, Ralph Ramos. Again just trying to get a hold of the whole situation. At that point I remember one thing. St. Vincent’s unit had some people in their vehicle they were going to transport, and I said, “You’re not going anywhere. You’re triaging.” I knew the importance of triage at that time until we got some more resources.

In between that I’m trying to transmit basically what’s going on. I can’t really remember much of my words except basically I was given them the access and advising that we have clear access to the location from both sides of West Street. I knew that was clear on both sides, whatever they could get in from that location.

There was debris all in the air, and I remember I mentioned at one time this is a hard hat operation. Then as I’m communicating I catch from my peripheral vision on the right -- I didn’t even think about it hitting the building. I’m just basically like what the hell is he doing there. Before I knew it, he disappeared behind the building, and bingo, there was an explosion.

I remember yelling over the frequency, however I communicated, a secondary explosion in the second building. At that time I remember I repeated over and over, because I had debris hit my helmet, “This is a hard hat situation, a hard hat operation, a hard hat operation.”

I looked around me, and everybody like maybe stopped for a few seconds like, whoa. I can honestly say that it didn’t stop the operation from moving in the direction that it was moving at that particular time. Everybody kind of appeared to still continue doing what they were doing. The firefighters were still loading into the building, except that now they’re starting to run over to tower two. A little while right after that, I started seeing a couple light blue shirts come in. I don’t remember the lieutenant’s name.

Lieutenant Mann was one of them from operations I remember seeing. Then I saw Lieutenant Terranova.

Q. Ross?

A. Ross he’s here now. And Chief Gombo. I came over to Chief Gombo. I still speak about this, because the look that he gave me -- he looked at me with his mouth open, and I looked at him the same way. I handed him my clipboard with the units that I had there to start. It was basically like the command was turned over with very little communication. It was just like this is it. He knows I knew the area, and he asked me what was in the other side of the building. I’m like a little rattled. I think Loutsky or Ralph, because these guys follow directions, I told them to stay with me like glue.

Every time I turned around, I bumped heads with them. They told me Church and Fulton. Church and Fulton was told to Chief Gombo. He said, “You go ahead and start operations over there and get the vehicle over there. “ We sent 1 Charlie, in their bus, came back over here, on Vesey going over t o Church and Fulton right here in front of the Millennium.

Q. Did your vehicle go there also?

A. Yeah. I got in my vehicle, and I started going. However, on the way there a body jumps -- well, I think I drove over a couple of bodies and stuff like that. Another walking body jumped in front of my vehicle . That happened t o be Captain Stone.

He was like, “Stop!” He ran from somewhere and just -- “Where you going?” I said, “Church and Fulton.”

He said , “I need you to take me here.”

I said , “Chief Gombo told me to go ahead.”

He said , “I told you to fucking take me here.

“I said , “Okay. You’re going there. You’re going there.”

I put him in the vehicle and brought him over to the command post, got my vehicle turned back around, and I made it to Church and Fulton.

Q. That’s indicated by number 2 on the map?

A. Right. Church and Fulton, I tell you, when we first got there, it took longer than it would take normally to get there. There were lamp posts in the street. There was all kinds of metal on the street. There’s soot about two feet high in different areas throughout the street. There’s bodies. There’s been a couple of bodies and people still coming out. Of course now we’re being approached by PD and everything: I have a patient here. I’ve got a patient there. I’m telling them, “I can’t handle it. Tell them to run and go that way. Tell them to go that way.”

What we started doing is right in front of the Millennium, started to direct walking wounded to go over up Fulton Street, and the ones that needed oxygen, things of that nature, we were setting up over here in this area.

Already by that time now I started getting more resources. I saw the Cabrini paramedics show up. I had a lot of AMR units there. Lieutenant $1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1**.

Q. $1$1** ?

A. $1$1* Right. Now, you want t o hear personal feelings? I’ll give you personal feelings.

You know what, she could be a fantastic person, but they don’t have field experience. I think this is very important, because a couple incidents happened. I went over and I see Loutsky, and I walk over.

First of all, she was there. She was a captain, the highest ranking. But I still felt that I was in charge of that operation and I felt it calling me to that.

I had my unit 1 Charlie, and I see Alex. By t h a t time we’ve got AMR, and we’re loading the AMR buses. They were parked, and they were parking all over. There was no structure. So what we’re doing is we’re blocking that access and egress out of that location. There was no structure. The same thing with my voluntary units that were coming there. They had 911 training. They’re able to go ahead and treat the patient accordingly. However, no idea of the incident command system, staging or about getting in, getting out.

When I started doing AMR, I started to tell Loutsky, “Load all the minor injuries and stuff in there. Get them and just tell them to take the bus over to Brooklyn.” I didn’t want to load the hospitals in Manhattan. Shoot the bus over to fucking Brooklyn. Just get them out of the way, because they were in the way. That was the bottom line. But I see Loutsky at one time with a clipboard, and he’s trying to take names of people that are fucking hysterical.

I said, “What the fuck are you doing?” He said, “The captain told me to do tracking and take names.”

Tracking is fine when you’ve got 10 patients and 20 patients and maybe even 50 patients, but I’ve got two fucking 110-story buildings emptying out in front of me and I’ve got a captain telling me do tracking.

So I told him, “Fuck what the captain said. I’m in charge, and I’m telling you forget about names and forget about fucking numbers. Just load them in the bus and get them out of here. “If I ‘m wrong, you write me up, and I’ll go see your guys in BITS. But you know what? Fuck it. I thought that was -- and I told her afterwards when we did that interview for Third Watch. I made it a little joke. I had to be a little respectful, but I had to go ahead and explain that.

The sector was starting to get - formed -- we had like the sector. I had $1$1$1$1 is a very nice guy. People in operations, they’re not used to the fucking street or to reality. He came in and all of a sudden he started talking on the radio. I said, “ $1 what the fuck you doing talking on the radio?*”

Gombo don’t got time to hear that shit. This is the big one. We got an assignment. You do the assignment. Bottom line, get the patients out. Maybe down the line you get calmed down. Then you start playing here’s the command system. Bottom line is you’ve been trained to do this; you go ahead and do it. I’m pissed off a little now about it after the fact. Then you didn’t have the time. It was just like what the fuck are you doing?

So I came out and said, “You want command? Here, use my radio. Take command. But we need to react. Somebody needs to be the treatment officer. You’re a medic. I gave you the treatment officer.”

Bottom line, I didn’t want to go ahead and pull I’m the senior lieutenant, whatnot. It wasn’t time for that. These are some of my feelings, because if they’re going to do anything about this, people need to remember the old way we used to do it in EMS that, you know what, the senior lieutenant is the one in charge until the next person of rank comes in, in that nature.

The bottom line is get the patients out. Triage and get the patients out of the goddamn way. That’s the bottom way. That’s the way I was taught. That’s the way Chief Goldfarb taught me back in the old days. This is the way you do MCI, this is the way you do it, get it done. Guys like Captain Stern and Jeff Armstrong.

All these guys, they did MCIs, not the playing and fucking around on the radio, talking about I’ve got this and that, because you know what? You got thousands of people coming. By now I’m watching people jump out of windows. It’s not like when I saw them jump six, seven or eight out of the Shomberg Plaza up in Harlem. They were jumping now one, two, three, four, smashing like fucking eggs on the ground.

People were getting hit by bodies falling.

These guys were talking about write down names. I was like, you’re fucking out of your mind.

(Interruption.)

A. Again, the system was starting to get running. I remember Duane Walker. Duane Walker is one of the division supply guys. He came and brought extra tanks of 02, starting unloading those in the sector. I remember asking somebody to try to tape off areas over here in front of the Millennium, because you had the lobby, you had the lobby was here in the corner, and I was telling the walking wounded to go that way. We had people with all kinds of injuries. A lot of the primary injuries that we were getting originally was nothing but hysterical patients, a lot of hysterical.

I remember one guy across the street went in to a grand mal seizure and stuff like that, and they pulled me over there . This guy is down and I looked. I said , “He’s having a seizure. Just stay around him and make sure he doesn’t get hurt. Bye.”

We were starting to get people moving.

Again, we were using AMR. They had like three or four buses there , if I’m correct. I know about two of them before the collapse happened I was able to get out , load them up and get them out of here.

Now, something that really fucks with me a lot is Lillo. Lillo came up to me and said, “Lieutenant, my wife is in the building. “ I’m like, “Oh, what are you saying? What are you saying?” I don’t even know his wife. I knew his other wife that worked the same job, but I don’t know his new lady.

“Okay, do me a favor. Help me out here and if I see her I’ll direct you to her.”

We were just working along. People were pulling my coat, “This one is more serious. I’ve got to go.” Tag them. We get a bus, we throw them in.

I remember one guy was laying down. He had an open chest wound about the size of my fist in his right chest. I kept on looking. I knew what was coming. I knew he was going to go downhill. He had that look in his eye like -- he wasn’t even talking. He was going into shock.

All of a sudden you heard the rumble and people yelling and screaming. You look and you see -- I didn’t see the top of the building.

I didn’t see the top of tower two. The collapse started. You felt like the ground -- it was like a deep sound, rumble; like you’re laying on the platform and the D train is coming. You look and you see what -- I best describe it as a wave coming.

I started running in my direction. I started running into the hotel. Something knocked me. I don’t know whether it was --

Q. The Millennium?

A. We were in front of the Millennium. I’m talking going in through the lobby.

Q. Okay.

A. Something knocked me down. I don’t know if something hit my helmet or whether it was a force. I got down, and I thought I’ve got to get up. By the time I got up, it was like [sound] I’m overcome by black and I’m running in the building in this black, and I’m running and I’m running and I’m running.

The next thing I know, I see a little light, and I follow that light. I run in there, and I find I’m in an office, and I close the door. I close the door and then I start walking, and I’m panicked, I’m panicked. I lost it. I lost it for a few minutes in here.

In this room there’s nothing but computers, maybe five, six computers, and phones.

As I’m in there, this force is still coming through the cracks of the door. I see some coats and I saw a water fountain. So I wet them, and I wet them and I stuff them under. I’m like walking back and forth, “I’m a medic. I’m a medic. I’m not a fucking firefighter. What do you do? What do you do? What do you do?”

I went to one of the computers for a minute. I thought I’d go on AOL or something and call for help. I was like, “What the hell am I doing?” I was in a dead end. There was no way out of that office. I’m now going, “What the fuck did you do? You idiot.

You ran out.

There’s no way out. You’re going to die in here.” It was getting real difficult for me to breathe in there, the dust, and there was no air transmitting across. There was a bunch of debris. I tried to get out. I said, “I’ve got to get out of here.” I’ve got one of those little super lights from Gauls magazine. Better than a mag light. It’s pretty bright. It wasn’t bright enough. Could you excuse me a minute?

MR. ECCLESTON: We’ll stop the tape at 12:47. (Pause.)

MR. ECCLESTON: We’re continuing this interview at 12:49.

A. I was in this office or whatever it was. I went ahead -- I opened up the door, and some of it -- the noise had settled. However, you heard distant sounds. I said let me try to get out of here. I opened up. It’s pitch-, pitch-, pitch-black. The only light was inside the door.

I grabbed this mag light, and I said maybe if I could make it out through this corridor or whatever I walk through I’ll hit some light and I’ll get the hell out of here. I’ve got this light and I’m feeling myself through the wall. With the flashlight you could only see probably less than a foot.

I’m feeling. All of a sudden I am walking and walking and I find myself inside an elevator. That’s when I realized this is the wrong thing to do, because it could be the elevator is not here and I’m going to end up falling down the shaft.

So I tried to get back. It took me a while to find myself back. By now I’m really gagging for air. I get back in, and I close back that door. When I got in there, now it’s a different feeling. It’s a feeling of this is it, I bought the bullet, I’m going to die. I have to honestly say, all of a sudden from the panic that I was at it was just like a warmth. What do you do?

Actually what I did, I picked up the phone, and I got a dial tone. I called my wife. She doesn’t really work too far. I called her, and I’m thinking -- if she answers the phone hysterical. I got the secretary or somebody in the office, and she was on the phone. She said, “I saw it . “Her office is up at 250 Church. They viewed the whole thing. She knows I work this area and the whole nine yards.

• I’m said, “ $1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1* You could hear her yelling on the other side of the phone with people from 911.

I’m said, $1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1pages 25 & 26*]

I don’t know how much time goes by between those periods, but there still wasn’t the second collapse. I come out. I push out some of the rubble and stuff like that. I started seeing a little light, which turned out to be the lobby.

I came out in the lobby, and it’s destroyed. I couldn’t go out the way I came in through the lobby. I came out through the side door on Fulton Street. I’m covered in soot.

I come out. It was terrible when I got there and we set up all of this and how I drove there. There were people on the ground. There was debris morbidly all over.

I was devastated. I was like relieved that I got out of that building, but I was like look at this. The radio was basically quiet then. If you heard anything, it was point-to-point communications.

You heard some maydays and you hear people yelling for help, 13. I’m like walking like the (inaudible), and I met up with this kid Ramos. And we hugged and we kissed. I told him, “What we can’t do alone we can do together. We’ll get the fuck out of here.”

He goes (inaudible). I said, “Ramos?”

He said, “What?” I said, “I left my wallet and my refund check in the fucking vehicle. I don’t think Uncle Sam is going to give me another refund check.”

Q. At this point was your vehicle lost?

A. Basically all we to do is go around the building, came around. But it took longer than usual because you’re walking in like this shit. Like you move and it’s this soot like heavy dust. While we’re walking I realize that we only have two people. I see my vehicle. The seats are covered. I’ve still got my bag. I hold it like a trophy. Like people collect basketballs. I haven’t touched -- whatever the force was, it was so strong that it went inside of the bag. But we were there. Vehicle 219 was destroyed.

Q. Was it on fire?

A. What?

R . DAVI LA

Q. Was it on fire?

A. Fire? We saw the sucker blow up. We heard “Boom!” We were walking up Fulton Street. I don’t know how far we made it up when someone says, “The building’s coming down.”

S0 By the time I realized, it’s a repeat. We were running, and I looked back and it seems like the sides of the street were getting narrower. The sound got louder and the wave. I remember we separated one time and Ramos wanted to go down into the train station. I said, “No fucking way. We’re out here. Without ventilation, we’re definitely dead.” I said, “If I’m going to die, I’m going to die with a fighting chance.”

We held hands, and we were running.

The next thing we know, [sound]. When it covers you, it’s silent. Ramos was just a little slightly like (inaudible). I couldn’t see him. I tell him -- I always have a handkerchief; it’s an old Spanish thing. I had my handkerchief, and I wrapped it around. I told Ramos the same thing. I said, “Wrap something around your mouth. Keep the soot and stuff out and just breathe shallow. Just take enough oxygen, because you don’t want to breathe all this dust.”

If anything that was comical, the human body -- or maybe I’m just a fucking nut.

Things that happened, because we’re walking and Ramos says, “Lieutenant.” I’m like, “What the fuck you want?” You could hear each other and that’s it.

He said, “I lost my radio.” We’re dying. We’re going to die. This guy is telling me he lost his fucking radio. I said, “Remind me if we make it through this, and I’ll fucking write you up.”

The next thing you hear (knock), my helmet hits -- I still don’t know what it is.

I’m assuming it was a lamppost or something. That’s when I told Ramos this is not going to work, we’re not going to make it. We decided we were holding on together. We held together, baby.

We moved over to the right, and we felt along through the buildings. Along through the building, all the businesses must have been locked up after the first impact, because all the businesses were closed. We’re walking and walking.

I happened to catch a little light.

There was a glass in a cleaner. I’m banging, “Open the fuck up or I’m kicking this shit in.” Nobody wanted it kicked in because all that shit will come in. They opened up. We ran in. We came in there -- what turned out to be a Subway store.

There were a bunch of people in there. I was happy to see them; they were happy to see us. I have to honestly say that thank God for those people and the situation I thought of, because they were looking at us because we were in uniform. “Us” is me and Ramos. Ramos is looking at me because I’m the lieutenant. So, that took away the panic from me, and reliving this it’s , okay, I’m Lieutenant Davila, I’ve got to be a leader.

So I remember -- I go and I yell out, “Who’s the boss?” An oriental guy raises his hand. I said , “Well, by order of the City of New York, I’m the boss now. Go in your register, get your money, put it in your pocket.”

Then I told everybody step back, and I told anybody who tried to open up the door I was going t o kick their ass. I got everybody to the back of the store.

I remember I told the man -- there was two guys that were willing to help.

I said, “Just get some stuff, stuff it under the door and try to keep as much debris, or whatever, coming in.”

I didn’t know what was going on. I know the first building fell and there was shit all over, and I know the second one fell and we were closer to it. I have to honestly say after the first plane hit , I thought there was a chance of me dying.

After that first collapse and I was in that building, I thought I was dead. I made it through that and I’m like, oh, fuck.

I tell you, the feelings, again, that I’ve had, you know what, false pride is unbelievable, things that we have to go through, $1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1 [Redacted section - page 31*]

This is what I’m thinking about. But I was thinking of myself as a corpse already.

Lieutenant Davila died in the line of duty. I kept these people in the back.

They’re a ll hysterical. I ‘m like, “Shut up. Stop it. You can’t control this. Let’s try to make it together. Save the oxygen.” I was telling them, “Nobody move without me knowing where you’re going.” You know what was the funniest thing?

I ended up taking off my turnout coat . I took it and I threw it over the counter. The Chinese guy came and took my turnout coat and pulled it on the floor . I’m like, “What the fuck you doing?” He said , “Food, food.”

I’m like, “Fucking food, there’s soot all over this shit. “ Now I’m mad. I took my fucking thing and I put it back over it. “Fuck you, you jerk.” $1$1$1$1 [Redacted section - page 32]

I made him open up the refrigerator, get bottles of water, give it to the people to drink.

We were in there for a while. The time period that we were in there I really don’t know. I would probably say maybe 20 minutes or so like that. Then all of a sudden we start seeing the lights start flickering.

So what I did was I told them to open up the door and I came out. I came out just to look and see what’s going on there. I started seeing some people up in the corner. It was much clearer. I guess that’s where the avenue opened up, West Broadway, where it was opening up. I think Chase Manhattan Bank is over here. So what I did was I came back in there.

I saw a couple ambulances and stuff. I asked the Oriental guy, “Do you have any towels?” He said, “Yeah.” I said, “Everybody grab a towel. Wrap it around your face.” I had everybody holding hands. I had about 18, 20 people in there. I had everybody hold hands, and I just had them go out the side of the building and just head east.

We came up here, and it was me and Ramos. We came out to sunlight, I saw Bruce Medjuck there. I think I saw Pat Scaringello. Then we started hearing the radio: “Stage in Battery Park or Chambers and West.” It would be just sounds and it was horrible. It sounded horrible. I really thought that we had -- would have a lot more casualties than what it was, because I didn’t see them. The thought was devastating.

Then, I forgot, Amy Monroe showed up at he staging area $1$1* [Redacted - page 34] Bill Melarango. These people need to be commended. We came in and had to be there. Bill was a station boss. She was out on leave of absence. Then she shows up in a crisp white uniform.

When I got up there, my concern was for Bill, Amy and Alex. $1* [Redacted - page 34*] But me and Ramos went nuts going looking for them. Walking back over there, we found Alex. He’s okay. We never found Amy. We never found Bill. We went back there looking for them and looking for them and couldn’t find them.

We thought maybe we lost them. So again it was me and Ramos. You know, I go to the right guy. I said, well, okay, we’ve got to regroup. I hear this going on -- and we begin walking. We walked down to Beekman. Beekman was set up pretty nicely. We waited for patients and stuff like that. There were a couple of patients, but not what they were preparing for. That was really like -- I started thinking, we ain’t getting the numbers.

The force of this was so great that there was debris and soot all the way down past South Street. So I had to do something. We’re there.

I called it war then. It’s really war now. I said, like, okay, I’ve got to deal with this. What will you do? What am I going to do? I started meeting a couple of people straggling out, some of St. Vincent’s units. I’m going, okay, I’m the only one here with any authority. So they were helping out at the hospital, and I told them to continue. I asked them what they were doing. They just brought a couple patients there. Then one or two of them, their partners were missing, so they were just cross-eyed. I got them in the room, calmed them down, take it easy.

I found this guy Duane Walker, the equipment guy, here. Basically I’m like, “Come on, fellows.” I got Lawrence from communications. I don’t know how he ended up getting them. He ended up there with civilian clothes and a shield. I said, “You’re going to stay with us too.”

Q. Do you know what his last name is?

A. No. I know he’s an EMT for -- he works for communications. (Inaudible). He was there. Ashby, you know about Ashby; right?

Q. Yes.

A. I found out that there was -- I forgot the name of the place now. I go there all the time. But right down Fulton Street -- okay, this is further down. Down by Beekman, down by Fulton and Pearl there’s a nursing facility, and they work in conjunction with New York Downtown. I heard they were starting a triage and the treatment center over there. I took a walk down there to see how they were doing. I spoke to one of the doctors over there. Basically what the doctor at that time told me was that they needed some saline and tubing for eye washing stuff. So I walked back to hospital 01.

I wasn’t going to bring that equipment back over there, because I knew I had to get back to an EMS command. I had to make a decision, I was going to the Battery or I’m going to West and Chambers. So I told them and I got the Cabrini people to go ahead and bring them their supplies. I did that.

Finally I was trying to decide which way I’m going to go, and my decision was I’m going to West and Chambers. My real reason for going to West and Chambers is because I knew my wife was on Church, and in walking I had to go by there, it’s just a block by. I actually went by and said I’m here, I’m alive.

Then I left and headed to the command post at West and Chambers. Everything down there was pretty calm. Actually it took a little while to get to West and Chambers and stuff like that still. You’re meeting up with people. I found out they had a little staging area already.

That’s where I met up with Captain Parra.

MR. ECCLESTON: Rene Davila on October 12th, 2001, continuation on side two.

A. Actually prior to meeting up with Parra on Greenwich, after we started crossing Church the other way, I ended up meeting academy personnel. I met up with a bunch of people from the academy. Captain Gio Pineda was there with a couple other people. I guess I must have been rowdy because they came both to me and Ramos and looked at us and said, “Come on, get in the bus, I’m not going on no bus. I’ve got to go work and everything else.”

Then the news media started. They found out that I was there, that I was in the Marriott and the first boss there. And Travis was there. Not the captain, the lieutenant.

Q. Barry Travis?

A. Yeah. And Maggiure -- the news media -- that’s okay -- I walked away from them. That’s when everyone went by and I saw Fern and I started heading towards West and Chambers $1$1$1$1$1$1 [Redacted - About half a page, pages 38 & 39*]

I made it back to West and Chambers.

That was a good sight. It was a good sight to see all the firefighters and all the firemen and seeing buses from like counties I never heard of. It must have been a couple hours already that passed by.

Then I made it to Stuyvesant School. Again, I’m not -- me and Ramos stuck together. I went there and I said I’m not staying and sitting in an auditorium. Then I was looking for something to do. I know I was part of it and I wanted to do more. I saw the itch in these poor kids that got there, and they wanted to do something. They were keeping them locked in -- you know why they should have had them standing outside. They were dying.

I remember I made it back out to the street and stuff again, and Chief McCracken came up to me. Chief McCracken saw me, and he said, “I thought you were dead. It’s good to see you.” That was it. We talked. We did it facing everybody hanging was. I’m still out there. That’s all there looking for Amy and Bill. I finally started -- somebody told me that Amy was at the hospital. I’ll tell you a story about that. I don’t care how unofficial that is, I (inaudible) on that one. Somebody saw Bill, so I felt a lot better.

Everybody took to their high horse and shit. I have to say that when I got to the command, I see Kowalczyk and everybody looked like they’re gummy bears, full of dust, and he was in his crisp white shirt. $1$1 [Redacted - page 40 & 41*]

Then I saw Stone coming in, and he said, “Rene, what are you doing? I want clipboards and paper pads.” I’m like, “You’re fucking serious? You want clipboards? I’ll get you fucking clipboards. I went to Stuyvesant High School. I’m Puerto Rican. I’m pretty good at something.”

I found my way to an office, and I start opening drawers. The secretary’s always got a stash. We open drawers and find a bunch of pads. I got him a pad, I got him a fucking pencil sharpener, I got him a fucking ruler, I got him clipboards, I got him everything out of there and said, “Here, mother fucker.”

I think McCracken just noticed that I was fucking wild. He ordered me, “I want you to sit down. You’re upset.” “No.” “That’s it. Sit down.”

That was it. That was basically where I ended up, me and Ramos. Then all of a sudden Ramos kind of collapsed on me, so I got a bus for Ramos. We were married then. He was going to hospital 01. I’m going to hospital 01 with him.

I don’t know about what time. I guess it was about 8:30, 9:00 at night.

We get him on a stretcher and into hospital 01. The nurses saw me there, and they grabbed me. I kind of buckled at the knees. They treated me like (inaudible). I still couldn’t stand still. I was like, “Get this shit off me.”

That’s basically my part. That’s how my day went. I finally got out of here probably around midnight or so, and I was back up at 4:30 in the morning. I was back here at 6:00 again. $1$1$1$1 [Redacted - page 42] That’s it.

Q. Is there anything else you would like to add? Any other feelings or anything?

A. $1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1* [Redacted - page 42]

Pages 43 and 44 of the testimony is nearly redacted fully!

$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1 On the EMS side of this, that I’m aware of, there’s only two fatalities. $1$1$1$1$1$1**

[Redacted - The rest of pages 44 to page 47]

A. I saw people die . I saw people jump out of windows, more than I’ v e ever seen in my life . Let me tell you something else. I’m 51 fucking years o l d . I’ve seen just about fucking everything and I’ve done a lot more. And you think about it. We have been able to keep ourselves intact. $1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1* I’m glad to see my bosses there. I’m glad to have seen McCracken there. I thank them.

And Gombo, who I heard almost died in this. I’m glad to see these guys. I was glad to hear Goldfarb on the radio, Mr. MCI. It was like, okay, here we go. $1$1$1* [Redacted *- MOST of page 49]

Q. You’ve got a lotto be proud of.

A. EMS didn’t do things that bad. $1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1$1** [Redacted on page 50] - Let me shut up. Thank you.

Q. Thank you today for conducting this interview with us.

MR. ECCLESTON: This interview is being concluded at 128 hours. The counter on the cassette player is 892 /-FPLT.

What chills this testimony gives us!

At the same time, much is also revealed;

According to Lieutenant Rene Davila;

1. The sound of the Towers disintegrating is described:

“All of a sudden you heard the rumble and people yelling and screaming. You look and you see -- I didn’t see the top of the building.

I didn’t see the top of tower two. The collapse started. You felt like the ground -- it was like a deep sound, rumble; like you’re laying on the platform and the D train is coming. You look and you see what -- I best describe it as a wave coming.

I started running in my direction. I started running into the hotel. Something knocked me. I don’t know whether it was.”

Now listen to this clip, as the South Tower disintegrates, and is then immediately compared with a conventional controlled demolition. (1 minute clip)

S0 Listen to New York firefighter, Niels Jorgensen describing what happened - He talks of a disintegration, NOT a collapse or bombs going off as one would expect for a conventional controlled demolition. (2 minutes)

Even the survivors of stairwell B, the 9/11 Surfer Pasquale Buzzelli, on Surviving the Disintegration of the North Twin Tower, also speaks of a RUMBLING and the sound of a freight train coming at him… (3minutes)

This 9/11 Survivor Pete, also talks about a crackling sound, that he will never forget.

S0

S0

S0

1. The toasted cars all around the World Trade Center

Not only did Lieutenant Rene Davila, see his own vehicle spontaneously combust, but the news media was reporting on it, whilst the Twin Towers were still standing!

S0

S0Read pages 213 to 246 of Where did the Towers go? Then in his presentation, In Defence of Judy Wood, Dr David A. Hughes also touches on the toasted cars. (6 minutes)

Be sure to read my article directed at Dr David Hughes: No but, Dr David A. Hughes, as his opinion on certain aspects of the evidence Dr Wood presents, I find incorrect.

1. What is the reason for redacting parts of the testimony?

I can only speculate that certain aspects could be more incriminating into exposing anomalies that would help researchers come to the full conclusion that some sort of weaponized energy was in play.

As per my two linked articles at the beginning of the article, the 499 witness testimonies is a treasure trove to find testimonies that go against the official narrative and the government approved counter narrative, making sure good intentioned truth seekers do not get to the full truth of what happened on September 11, 2001.

I will again implore you to read and distribute 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza’s open letter to the US Government, the 9/11 truth movement and 9/11 truth seekers alike.

A last thought in closing, as shared with Sonia Poulton on 9 February, 2026.

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

Please support the work of Truth Action Project by leaving a comment on the original Rumble upload.

Dr. Morgan Reynolds, PhD in Economics, an author of several books, professor and, for a brief spell a policy analyst in government, he discovered that the official narrative about September 11th was false. This insight sent him down a truth rabbit hole that has led him to John Herold, MA., a partner in producing a “thought experiment” with AI to generate an amazing explanation of the September 11th event.

The focus is on the World Trade Center; a later version will include examination of the Pentagon and Shanksville to complete the review.

• Dr Reynolds' 2007 whistle-blower case against NIST for the fraudulent plane impact reports

Read the backstory for Operation Headfake here.

Can artificial intelligence help us understand what really happened on 9/11?

Or is it just a propaganda tool? The answer to both questions is yes.

Without clever questioning, ChatGPT blindly follows the official government conspiracy theory, upholding the myth that nineteen young Arabs hijacked airliners and crashed them into the Twin Towers, leading to gravity-driven collapses. Hogwash!

The mode of destruction that destroyed all of the buildings in the WTC complex was proven over fourteen years ago by Human Intelligence. Read more here.

“ChatGPT and 9/11 - Operation Headfake: A Thought Experiment with Artificial Intelligence” co-authored by Dr Morgan Reynolds and John Herold, MA.

What does AI, when presented with a “fictional” scenario (which matches real events), reveal about the events of 9/11, the planning, and the cover up?

See Chapter 43 about limited hangouts as well as Chapter 44 about the 9/11 truth movement.

Here’s a link to the Kindle edition & a link to standard color printed edition.

S0 You can also listen to my interview with Dr Reynolds, where we work through all the 9/11 Plane disinformation put out, like CGI planes, video fakery, the pod theory, remote controlled planes, documentaries like September Clues, Loose Change, A New Pearl Harbor, Codex 9/11, In Plane Sight and so much more.

The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11 - A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist. Article & Interview.

The best 9/11 documentary that they don't want you to watch.

9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality

Watch it now and share with your friends - Rumble upload & YouTube upload.

S0Watch the discussion here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

She claims that April Gallop had a conversation with Bill Deagle, and that April Gallop saw plane parts in the Pentagon, months BEFORE September 11, 2001.

This claim is due to the Bill Deagle Radio Show, March 11, 2022, Re: the Testimony Of April Gallop - Link to uploaded clip, which you can listen to below.

Now isn’t it strange that Barbara Honegger still wants you to believe a plane hit the Pentagon on 9/11, where all the evidence is pointing to NO PLANE hitting the Pentagon? Remember this about Barbara Honegger? Is she still a government asset?

Correction - Barbara wants to make the case for a drone that magically dissapears outside of the Pentagon and not a commercial jetliner, which she has absolutely no proof of. *

I asked Grok the following;

S0

S0

S0 So, there is no first hand original recording of April Gallop stating this it seems, we must get to bottom of this, because if there was such a recording available, it would have gone viral on social media years ago, yet, not even Grok can find it.

This matches what we suspect at the Twin Towers, that could have had plane parts planted inside the buildings, possibly during the fireproofing renovations...

What has April testified to in past interviews?

S0 What did she have to say to Jesse Ventura, when he did an episode on the Pentagon conspiracy? (2 minutes)

Then a longer interview…

Then as a reminder - Capt. Russ Wittenberg who flew Flights 93 and 175 prior to 9/11.

Other pilots also scream bullshit at the official Pentagon narrative. (3 min clip)

What did the first person with a video camera capture at the PentaCON?

To think he was NEVER interviewed by the 9/11 Commission! (2 minute clip)

I’ll also remind you of the service men who were tasked with cleanup, whom I’ve had conversations with, regarding what they saw and did not see at the PentaCON.

• Adam Eisenberg - 9/11 Pentagon Whistleblower
• OEFSOFSOLDIER - 9/11 Pentagon First Responder

Read: The PentaCON on 9/11 - When a missile AND a plane did not hit a target

I highly recommend you watch the following PentaCON breakdown. (20 minutes)

The crash investigation of NWA 1987.

S0

S0

S0

S0

ARTICLE UPDATE - 21 MARCH 2026

Mike Zarzano, see first clip of the article, has written Barbara Honeger, to verify her claims, pertaining to April Gallop. This is his writing;

Greetings Barbara Honegger,

With all due respect and determination I am attempting this inquiry once again because you previously sent me hearsay via Suszan Serpa as evidence of your claims on Boston 9/11 Truth over a month ago. A recording of radio host Bill Deagle claiming he heard April Gallup say she saw plane parts at Pentagon 90 days prior to 9/11 is not verification whatsoever.

Since I’ve made multiple unsuccessful attempts to request verification of this claim you made about April Gallup on Bill Deagle’s radio show March 11, 2022 that she saw plane parts inside the Pentagon 3 months prior to 9/11, I now must copy several others in this correspondence for purposes of truth, verification, accountability and reconciliation in this matter.

Also you have made multiple remarks agreeing with Gerry Burns remarks and or inferences that a Kevlar mesh is how the millions of confetti plane pieces were created at or near the Pentagon helipad. Does this continue to be your explanation for the confetti debris or have you determined your previous remarks or conclusions to be wrong as Richard Gage has claimed you have?

Currently there are several key people in the truth movement of 9/11 that await your answers to these vital questions.

I respectfully anticipate your prompt response to these questions.

I am sincerely,

Michael Anthony Zarzano-Investigator

For additional background information on the exchanges Mike Zarzano has had with the various truth talking heads and organizations, and this interaction had Mike receive an email, from the host Gene Laratonda, that Mike is no longer welcome attending his so called “round table discussion”. Here you will also hear the claims made by Richard Gage that Barbara Honegger walked back her claims, which Mike now is highlighting. (If you want more information on the gatekeeping tactics of Gene Laratonda, just go to my archive tab, and search his name.) 4 minute clip.

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

Anyone that pushes the CGI narrativeor remote-controlled planes are disinformation agents, or are seriously compromised, or has done f-all research, aka reading.

Now, what did people see / hear / take pictures of, and videoed in the sky over Manhattan on September 11, 2001? 🚨 Former CIA officer Robert David Steele:

Retired FBI Agent John Desouza on what people saw in the sky on 9/11.

First, we need to start with basic flight physics, aerodynamics, Newton’s 3rd law and basic impact dynamics.

1. Real world example that demolishes the narrative or should have people sit up and take note that something is wrong with the official narrative, is the crash of Flight 587 in NYC on November 12, 2001. The plane got its tail wing sheared off by the pilot and as soon as the plane exceeded 240 knots under 10 000 feet, and as it was falling out of the sky, the engines sheared off. See video lower down in article.
2. Researchers called Boeing to ask if a commercial jet could exceed 500 mph at 700 feet altitude and the reply was NO!
3. This was also confirmed by aeronautical engineers and a multitude of commercial pilots.
4. If you bother reading 9/11 Planes Research’s work, you will also come to find the official NTSB data and ACARS, PROVE beyond a shadow of a DOUBT that BOTH flight 11 and 175 were STILL AIRBORNE well AFTER they allegedly crashed.
5. NOT one ELT was registered for ALL FOUR alleged planes on 9/11. The AFRCC (Air Force Rescue Coordination Center) informed the 9/11 Commission that NO ELT’s were activated, at all between 8 a.m. and 10:30 a.m., within a radius of 50 nautical miles (about 57.5 miles) of JFK International Airport on 9/11.

This is an absolute “OFFICIAL FACT”, that neither American 11 or United 175 crashed at the North and South Towers, the officially named targets. Source.

1. Then there is the optics – People refer to the black whale image from the east of flight 175, and if the optics aren’t doing what it’s supposed to do, then one needs to ask the question why.
2. Taking all this into account – The people saw, heard, took pictures of, and videoed a real time illusion.
3. For those that know, the term “Project Blue Beam” comes to mind, or more descriptively 3D Volumetric Projection Technology.
4. On how the plane shaped holes were created, watch the documentary - 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality, linked below.

Read: Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11- Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts

Creation of the plane shaped holes (From 9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality)

S0 Dr Judy Wood on the plane shaped holes;

Now, go do your due diligence, and go read Dr Morgan Reynolds 2007 Qui-Tam whistle-blower case against NIST, for fraudulent impact studies, and the affidavit of John Lear…

John Lear - a Retired airline captain and former CIA pilot with 17 world records, including Speed Around the World in a Lear Jet Model 24 set in 1966.

He flew secret missions for the CIA in Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa between 1967 and 1983 and for 17 years of his career he worked for several passenger and cargo airlines as Captain, Check Airman and Instructor.

He was certificated by the FAA as a North Atlantic (MNPS) Check Airman. He also had extensive experience as command pilot and instructor in the Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 and Lockheed L-1011. In short - He knows WTF he’s talking about.

Read: The Fantasy Flights on 9/11 - The biggest hurdle for 9/11 truth seekers and normies

2007 Court filings by Dr Morgan Reynolds against NIST.

Full documentary here: 9/11 Alchemy - Facing Reality

Rumble Link & YouTube Link

The Suspension of Newtonian Physics on 9/11

A Plane conversation with Dr Morgan Reynolds & 9/11 Revisionist - Article & Interview.

There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;

1. Problem solving skills

2. Group Think

3. They just can’t handle the implications

Dr Wood 2012 presentation: Watch it here

Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.

ARTICLE UPDATE - 28 FEBRUARY 2026

A quick explanation that has had over 3.7 million impressions on X. X Post here.

ARTICLE UPDATE - 4 MARCH 2026

If you want to get really sciency on the 9/11, have a listen to this explanation by Bob Greenyer, from 5 years ago… Original full discussion

It’s also important for you to read the following article, by 9/11 Planes Research.

Nose-Out vs Dust Explosion?- An Independent Video Analysis

The 9/11 Plane & No Plane debate settled- Most probably the best distraction of WHAT happened on September 11, 2001

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as Substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

Very few items were recovered from the rubble, though a paper icon of St. Dionysius of Zakynthos was famously found. Read my article: The Miracle on September 11, 2001

S0 The only journalist that was allowed access to the World Trade Center Complex, or as it was called “Ground Zero”, was William Langewiesche, and listen to what he describes, when discussing the destruction, and focus on what he has to say about the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church. (1 minute)

In 2018, the Greek orthodox priest, at the 1 hour 11 minute mark, concludes his remarks to the audience with a story of the St. Nicholas Church, that was “totally destroyed”...“rendered into dust...” and the force of the event “pushed the church 20 feet down...” into the ground???, says the priest, at the end of the musical event.

The church was totally destroyed (on purpose to clear the way)? But the priest got permission, and was escorted into the hole to retrieve religious objects, shortly after September 11, 2001... and he describes the scene. (6 minute clip)

It is hard to hear well, his accent is thick, it would be great to get his remarks transcribed; or use some kind of tech to enhance his voice so it is easily understood. As it is, not optimal for production and even YouTube’s transcription is not accurate.

So, this is another testimonial of the energy tech going over the street and creating a 'collateral damage', as we saw with the Bankers Trust Building, that had ongoing effects affecting the steel structure of the building, and had to be taken apart, piece by piece, after millions was spent in repairing the 40 story building. Article here & here.

S0

I just need to share the following from my article, The Miracle on September 11, 2001. “The great miracle, [...] was the recovery of an icon of St. Spyridon. The silver around the icon had melted, but the paper icon had not been burnt.” This discovery was one of the church’s most holy relics, and it was declared a miracle because the silver only applied to a paper icon of St. Spyridon had “burned off”, leaving the paper intact and unscorched. The melting point of silver is 1,763°F. What “melted” the frame?

S0 Another interesting testimony I’ve come across, is the following; unfortunately I’ve not got a direct link to the talk this gentleman had at a school on one of the anniversaries, but he makes a good observation of what he saw, when running for his life when the South Tower disintegrated. (2 minute clip)

Very few people use the correct terms to explain what was happening to the Towers.

He’s very descriptive: “It all dissolved, right in front of us.” He’s also astute by explaining the booms he heard, to be attributed to gas lines compressing as the building was dissolving, something I cover regarding the first responder testimonies of hearing explosions and also in my article, Was every BOOM on 9/11 a bomb? (4 min clip)

For the full 1 h 30 minute documentary, follow this link.

I need to dwell on the explosions for a bit, as social media is all the rage, pushing the conventional controlled demolition crap lately. Watch this clip I put together.

Where is the earth shattering, BA BOOM!!?

If you haven’t listened to my conversation withWilliam Ramsey Investigates, Dismantling the 9/11 Collapse & Controlled Demolition Theories, I suggest you do.

For additional reading and resources, for people who need to learn the difference between a conventional controlled demolition, and that of a molecular disintegration, have them read the following;

• A Collapse / Demolition Thought Experiment
• Controlled Demolition Expert Speaks Out!
• Myanmar Provides a 9/11 Lesson for Critical Thinkers
• The Forgotten Firefighters of Stairwell B of the North Tower

And don’t forget to share the 9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza’s open letter, Seeking the whole truth of September 11, 2001. Full 40 min interview can be watched, here.

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as Substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

Remember DO NOT get your hands on this absolutely scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

And whatever you do, don’t watch the 1h “9/11 Essential Guide”.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

Get the popcorn, as Adam goes deep! Some timestamps below to help you navigate.

Timestamps:

0:00 - Introduction

1:00 - Adam tells us to take this all in in bitesize chunks, as it’s a very in depth look into what he’s uncovered of the last couple of years of his research into the PentaCON

2:35 - The Orion Project, the taking the blue or red pill and the 9/11 spoof movement

4:00 - 550 000 views of his Redacted interview - see more here

5:00 - Background of phycological operations, false flags, Operation Northwoods and how the US MIC is willing to kill it’s own citizens

15:00 - April Gallop and her court case - see more here

16:30 - Citizens Investigation Team - The OG PentaCON exposers

17:30 - Pilots for 9/11 truth were speaking out to the ruse of the official narrative

19:00 - The 9/11 Spook Panel

20:00 - The patsy hijackers and military failures

21:40 - The BOGUS Turning the Tide event in DC, September 2025

23:15 - The International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression - Read more here & here

24:30 - Operation Northwoods

25:00 - FBI was ready to go prior to 9/11

26:30 - Chapter 1 - Pedigree - Who is Adam Eisenberg? Is he Jewish?

A history of who Adam is - upbringing, military deployment and work history

Where was he and what was he doing before going to the Pentagon on September 11, 200?

What was he doing at the Pentagon for 240 hours?

01:30:00 - How did Adam come across his person of interest? What is his background?

02:15:00 - Lee Wheelbarger and his ties to exotic weaponry

02:24:00 - The tough decision that Adam had to make regarding his Pentagon research

Should Adam just focus on his testimony or go after Lee Wheelbarger?

What did Adam start doing and how did Wheelbarger respond?

02:36:20 - Adam reaches out to the 9/11 “truth movement” talking heads and their responses were shocking to say the least!

• Christopher Bollyn
• Dan Hanley
• David Chandler
• Barbara Honegger

03:00:18 - Adam starts to challenge Wheelbarger publicly on his Wheelbarger’s socials.

• Adam breaks down how suspect Wheelbarger’s presence at the Pentagon was.*

03:29:45 - Further interactions with the 9/11 “truth movement” and Adam starts to call them out as distraction artists

• David Chandler
• John Edward Kendrich

03:33:15 - Further public interactions with Lee Wheelbarger

03:38:23 - Some thoughts on Barbara Honegger

3:40:20 - Wayne Coste and how he told Adam to GO AWAY

03:41:20 - Nelson Martins aka DJ Thermal Detonator (911 True Crimes)

03:43:05 - Adam’s interactions with Richard Gage and Ken Jenkins, that did not want Adam to look into Lee Wheelbarger

03:47:30 - Adam’s interactions with Adam Fitzgerald and James Schwartz

03:52:00 - More on Ken Jenkins

03:54:23 - More interactions with Richard Gage that was RED FLAGS everywhere

4:03:45 - Back to Adam Fitzgerald and James Schwartz

04:08:59 - Adam’s third big break regarding Lee Wheelbarger

04:17:55 - Another 9/11 “truther pops up, David Cole, looking into Lee Wheelbarger and manufactured ignorance

04:20:50 - Oral histories about Operation Noble Eagle, Response to 9/11, and trying to get more official documents from the US MIC and the US Government

04:41:40 - Getting back to Lee Wheelbarger and the Pentagon

04:50:45 - Trying to put a research team together and their refusal to sign NDA’s

• Xander Arena
• Seth McVey
• Craig McKee
• Adam Ruff

05:02:20 - Moving into 2024 and Adam’s further research into Lee Wheelbarger

05:14:10 - Who shows up? Ruby Gray, aka Lorraine Clarke

Interesting FB message she left for Adam - Name it “Dead Orion Project”

She features in my latest Pentagon article, Explosive Testimony: Pentagon Survivor April Gallop, in the comment section

05:32:15 - Adam’s first in studio interview with Far out With Faust - Link

05:32:50 - Lee Wheelbarger’s ongoing attacks against Adam and Adam’s further research into Lee Wheelbarger

06:36:05 - Adam’s interactions with Gene Laratonda, one of Richard Gage’s gate keepers

06:37:34 - Getting back to Adam’s investigation into Lee Wheelbarger and how he could still be an active asset for the government and his ties to Israel

06:58:08 - Thank you for listening and final thoughts.

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

The long awaited “New Investigation”, read this very scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

For a 1h crash course into the destruction at the WTC watch the 9/11 Essential Guide.

For a crash course into all three sites on 9/11, watch9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

It’s a free flowing discussion about the whistleblower Qui-Tam cases filed by Dr Morgan Reynolds and Dr Wood in 2007, that the 9/11 truth movement does not want you to know about, as well as the plane anomalies with Shanksville, the PentaCON, the WTC destruction, the 9/11 truth movement and so much more.

A whole industry has been created - A whole “truth” movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.

Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.

Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11.

Have a listen and read the 2007 court filings you’re NOT supposed to know about..

• Dr Reynolds’ case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports.
• Dr Wood’s case was for the destruction at the WTC complex.

For additional reading, I will suggest the following two articles, that covers John Lear’s affidavit and then also the first responder testimonies, pertaining to the alleged planes at the World trade center.

• The Fantasy Flights on 9/11 - One of the biggest hurdles for 9/11 truth seekers and normies
• Going in Search of Planes in NYC on 9/11 - Revisiting 1st Responders’ Accounts

Also read: Dr Judy Wood on the PBD podcast - A REACTION ARTICLE: “The Towers Went Poof” - Twin Towers Disintegration & Direct Energy Evidence

Richard Gage denying that he knows about these cases (7 minute clip)

Ted Walter, International Center for 9/11 Justice, suppression - denying he knows about these cases, also in 2023 (11 minutes)

Patricia Casazza, 9/11 Jersey Girl, exposing the limited hangout 9/11 truth movement.

Be sure to read her open letter - Read it here, and listen to our in depth interview, here.

9/11 FACTS that hurt people’s feelings - 43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes - Read more here

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as Substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

The long awaited “New Investigation”, read this very scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

For a 1h crash course into the destruction at the WTC watch the 9/11 Essential Guide.

For a crash course into all three sites on 9/11, watch9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com

Elsa Schieder has a triple disciplinary PhD - Psychology, Sociology, Literary Theory.

She has taught in 6 departments at the university and college level: Humanities, Education, English, Film Studies, Women’s Studies, and Sociology. She was long a tenured Humanities prof at John Abbott College.

Richard Gage was one of the first interviews she had recorded for her “Truth Summit”, scheduled for June 2023, and after posting about the interview to her contacts, she was contacted by numerous people for an additional 9/11 researcher, that she must get a hold of, and it ended up in some rather interesting additional conversations on the 9/11 subject.

I suggest you check out the following articles she wrote, after the summit.

Make sure to check out the explosive comment sections, as well as the rather explosive panel discussion on the close of her “truth summit”, where two 9/11 “truthers” ended up having a sparring session, and surprisingly enough, most of the panelists DISAGREED with Richard Gage. (Video below 5 minutes)

1. A Personal Taking Stock on 9/11

1. REFUTATION OF GAGE’S GAME.

See my original 2023 article - The Molecular Dissociation of the Thermite & Nuke theories

And with that background, I would like to get into this article with regards to the refutation of Richard Gage, as the links in the PDF linked in point two above, need to be updated, which I will now do below, and add in some video clips, to help you understand more of the points highlighted, but also be sure to have a listen to my interviewDr Judy Wood, Dr Morgan Reynolds and Mark Conlon, aka 9/11 Planes Research, from March 11, 2026 - interview link

Refutation of Gage’s Game 7/8/2023, by Dr Judy Wood

I don't respond well to dishonest or insincere statements. My time is too valuable.

If someone keeps posting the same nonsense for 15 years, it appears their objective is to consume my time and to manipulate others.

How does it feel to know you’ve been manipulated?

Mr. Gage has said that I dismiss thermite on page 126 of my book. Have you actually looked at page 126?

What is discussed on page 126 is the lack of significant seismic signal as stated by Shyam Sunder, a section on “The Kitchen Sink,” and a section on “Occam’s Razor.”

Thermite is mentioned in “The Kitchen Sink,” but only as an example of how some folks assume they’ll have the right answer if they claim everything was used, which is why I call that “The Kitchen Sink” approach.

Thermite is discussed elsewhere, in depth. Why does Mr. Gage reference a page that does not discuss thermite in depth? Is it to be deceptive? If someone goes to page 126, they won’t find much of a discussion about thermite. So by referencing page 126, Mr. Gage is being deceptive and dishonest.

If you want to know what thermite looks like, while just doing a single weld of railroad track, watch this and imagine what lower Manhattan would look like if a significant amount of thermite were used. From space, it might look like a piece of the sun had crashed into lower Manhattan. Andrew Johnson on Stew Peters, 2023 below.

Have you reviewed where I addressed this very same nonsense article by Gage fifteen years ago? That article is over 15 years old. I addressed it July 2, 2008, shortly after they posted that article. The fact that Mr. Gage is still promoting that article tells you all you need to know about him. See Dr Wood’s FAQ page on her website. Click here.

S0 If you REALLY want me to refute Mr. Gage’s propaganda piece, you would read through the FAQ page. You’ve had that link.

If you need particular links, here they are:

Please go to the links for the information. I’m not going to reproduce my entire webpage in email and send it to you, but this should help get you started.

S0 Note the members are banned from AE911Truth if they talk about the evidence.

Why would this be? See FAQ #38

The “URL” links below where the videos should be and should take you to the YouTube videos if the videos don’t show on the page. Clip below, from 2011.

As I stated at the bottom of that section, “An organization that bans discussion of the truth, while promoting disinformation, brings into question their agenda.”

That includes the audio to Mr. Gage’s claim that I’m practicing witchcraft.

Note, insults usually indicate that the person has no facts to rely on. FAQ #38

“If someone makes the statement that I have overlooked this issue when this is not true, it brings their credibility into question.” FAQ #39

S0 FAQ #40 & FAQ #41

S0Figure 21. Thermal map excerpt taken September 16, 2001. Zone F was supposedly the largest hot spot. (9/16/01) Source and here

S0Figure 22. This is a view from the southern "shore" after a water-main broke. Note the "steam" appearance along the "northern shore" that cannot be the result of "hot water" because there are live people wading along that shore. (9/11/01) Source: Does Mr. Gage believe these first responders are wading through “hot molten metal”?

FAQ #41 Why doesn’t Dr. Wood write refutations of all of the refutations claimed against her work?

This one is most significant.

There are numerous "debunking" articles that have been posted around the internet on various hit-piece sites, such as the Journal Of Nine Eleven Studies (or JONES).

One might ask why they have chosen to spend their time presenting the appearance of "infighting" rather than submitting a Request for Correction (RFC) to NIST with their purported "evidence", as I have done with mine, and why they have spent their time writing deceptive and dishonest hit pieces on the only person who has filed a Federal Qui-Tam case, to hold anyone accountable for science fraud, covering up the destruction of the WTC buildings.

Why haven't they spent their time filing a Federal Qui-Tam case with their so-called "evidence" instead of writing deceptive hit pieces?

This is especially troubling and brings into question their organization's true objective.

I have chosen to spend my time on determining what happened on 9/11, then submitting my findings to NIST in a Request for Correction (RFC), and subsequently filing a Federal Qui-Tam case seeking accountability for those who committed science fraud, and covering up the crime of 9/11.

Some of those covering up the crime know whose technology was used to carry it out.

So, why would the organized "truth movement" spend their energy and time writing hit pieces on me, instead of supporting this Federal Qui-Tam case?

As of today (September 30, 2011), my book has been out almost a year.

In that time, no one has refuted any of the information in my book. They cannot. It is empirical evidence.

Much organized effort has been made to divert attention away from the evidence I have presented, and to misrepresent it, and to cover it up. Those spending their time writing hit pieces that create a false impression of my work, instead of addressing the evidence of what happened on 9/11, reveal their primary objectives in doing so.

Note, twelve years (2023) after my book has been out, still no one has refuted anything in the book. They only promote disinformation about it.

Here is the book, “Where Did the Towers Go?”

Exploding Scott Packs.

You can ask yourself why Mr. Gage & Co. are denying this evidence?

So, will Mr. Gage spend the next 15 years posting deceptive articles and demanding I refute the same article over and over, and over again? Or will he do something useful?

What is his objective?

Mr. Gage came on the scene and first posted his AE911Truth web page, shortly after I filed my RFC (Request For Corrections) to NIST (March 2007). And, from the start, Mr. Gage’s top priority appears to be to undermine the work of Dr. Judy Wood.

If Mr. Gage wanted accountability for 9/11, he would have supported my Federal Qui-Tam case.

If he felt he knew better, he would have filed his own case.

Please answer this question: Why does Mr. Gage try to convince people that these first responders are wading through hot molten metal? FAQ #41

S0 Mr. Gage has been promoting this as rivers of hot-molten metal and lakes of hot-molten metal for 15 years. Why?

Remember, he’s had my book for over 12+ years, and those images are in my book (page 272).

S0 There are more pictures of the firefighters wading in that area on page 274.

Actually, it was a broken water main that flooded the area. No steam explosions and no boiled first responders. It should be pretty obvious they aren’t wading through hot molten metal.

Andrew Johnson said it well. After these events, there is always,

1. the official story,

1. the official cover-up, and

1. the truth.

Remember, it’s easier to control a large group of people than it is to control a single person. I now reclaim the remainder of my time. Dr. Judy Wood

The 9/11 truther cover-up

Also read: 9/11 Truth Suppression Timeline - “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” - Vladimir Lenin

9/11 Jersey Girl, Patricia Casazza discusses her open letter with Sonia Poulton

A half truth, is still a WHOLE LIE. - Patricia Casazza - Interview

Thank you for reading, thank you for watching, listening and still caring.

If you like reading my articles and would like to buy me a coffee, please follow the link to myPayPal, as substack does not allow for payments to my country yet.

If this is the first article of mine you’re reading, please rewind to my first articleand work your way through all of them, as you’ve missed out on a lot of valuable 9/11 and “9/11 truther movement” information.

The long awaited “New Investigation”, read this very scary book by Dr Judy Wood.

For a 1h crash course into the destruction at the WTC watch the 9/11 Essential Guide.

For a crash course into all three sites on 9/11, watch9/11 Alchemy: Facing Reality.

Free PDF book downloads by Andrew Johnson:

📄 9/11 – Finding the Truth and also 📄 9/11 – Holding the Truth

Come join the discussion on Telegram, find me on Xand check out my Rumble channel.

Share

Subscribe now

Originally published at 911revision.substack.com